Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Indication assessment · §2

Obesity and overweight in adults — evidence across compounds

Every compound the Institute assesses in obesity and overweight in adults, with its certainty rating.

Document identifier
CEI-IN-01/2
Series
Indication assessment
Version
1.3
Published
12 Jan 2026
Last reviewed
12 Jan 2026
Next review
12 Jan 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.ind.1
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2026 Q1
ICD-11
5B81
Category
Metabolic

§2Evidence across compounds

Every compound the Institute assesses in this indication, with the effect as recorded, the certainty rating and the contributing trials. Effects are reported on the anchor outcome where the contributing trials measured it and on the outcome the trial actually reported where they did not.

Table 1. Compounds assessed in obesity and overweight in adults, ordered by certainty.

CompoundEffect as recordedInterval as reportedCertaintyTrials
LiraglutideGLP-1 receptor agonist (acylated, once-daily)−8.0 % body weight at 56 weeks with 3.0 mg versus −2.6 % with placeboestimated difference −5.4 percentage points (95 % CI −5.8 to −5.0)High2
SemaglutideGLP-1 receptor agonist (acylated, long-acting)−14.9 % body weight at 68 weeks with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus −2.4 % with placebotreatment difference −12.4 percentage points (95 % CI −13.4 to −11.5)High5
TirzepatideDual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist (acylated)−20.9 % body weight at 72 weeks with 15 mg versus −3.1 % with placebo (SURMOUNT-1)treatment difference −17.8 percentage points (95 % CI −19.3 to −16.3)High5
AOD-9604Growth-hormone C-terminal fragment analogueA 12-week phase 2b trial in 300 participants did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in body weight versus placebo at any dosenegative resultModerate1
CagrilintideLong-acting amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist…−10.8 % body weight at 26 weeks with cagrilintide 4.5 mg monotherapy versus −3.0 % with placebo, and −8.6 % with liraglutide 3.0 mg as active referenceestimated difference versus placebo −7.8 percentage points (95 % CI −10.2 to −5.4)Moderate2
CagriSema (cagrilintide with semaglutide)Fixed-ratio combination of a long-acting amylin analogue…−22.7 % body weight at 68 weeks versus −2.3 % with placebo in adults with obesity without diabetesestimated difference −20.4 percentage points (95 % CI −21.7 to −19.1)Moderate3
DulaglutideGLP-1 receptor agonist, Fc-fusion protein−4.6 kg at 4.5 mg over 52 weeks in type 2 diabetesdifference versus 1.5 mg −1.9 kg (95 % CI −2.4 to −1.4)Moderate1
ExenatideGLP-1 receptor agonist (exendin-based, short- and…−2.3 to −3.6 kgmodestModerate1
LixisenatideGLP-1 receptor agonist (exendin-based, short-acting)−1.8 to −2.7 kgmodestModerate1
MazdutideDual glucagon and GLP-1 receptor agonist (oxyntomodulin…−14.4 % body weight at 48 weeks with 6 mg in a Chinese phase 3 trial versus −0.3 % with placeboestimated difference −14.1 percentage points (95 % CI −15.7 to −12.5)Moderate3
OrforglipronOral non-peptide GLP-1 receptor partial agonist−14.7 % body weight at 36 weeks with 45 mg in the phase 2 trial versus −2.3 % with placeboestimated difference −12.4 percentage points (95 % CI −14.8 to −10.0)Moderate3
RetatrutideTriple GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist (acylated)−24.2 % body weight at 48 weeks with 12 mg in the phase 2 trial versus −2.1 % with placeboleast-squares mean difference −22.1 percentage points (95 % CI −25.0 to −19.2)Moderate3
Semaglutide, oralGLP-1 receptor agonist, oral formulation with absorption…−15.1 % body weight with oral 50 mg at 68 weeks versus −2.4 % with placeboestimated difference −12.7 percentage points (95 % CI −14.2 to −11.3)Moderate1
SurvodutideDual glucagon and GLP-1 receptor agonist (acylated)−14.9 % body weight at 46 weeks with 6.0 mg in phase 2 versus −2.8 % with placeboestimated difference −12.1 percentage points (95 % CI −15.4 to −8.8)Moderate3
AmycretinUnimolecular amylin and GLP-1 receptor co-agonist−13.1 % body weight at 12 weeks in a phase 1b subcutaneous study versus −1.1 % with placebophase 1b; very small sampleLow3
DanuglipronOral non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist−8.0 to −13.0 % body weight at 32 weeks across doses, with discontinuation rates above 50 % in some armswide; high attrition compromises the estimateLow1
EcnoglutideGLP-1 receptor agonist (cAMP-biased, acylated)−13.2 % body weight at 48 weeks with the highest dose versus −0.5 % with placebo in a Chinese phase 3 trialestimated difference −12.7 percentage points (95 % CI −14.5 to −10.9)Low1
Maridebart cafraglutideGIP receptor antagonist and GLP-1 receptor agonist…−16.2 % body weight at 52 weeks at the highest dose in phase 2 versus −2.5 % with placeboestimated difference −13.7 percentage points (95 % CI −17.1 to −10.3)Low2
PetrelintideLong-acting amylin analogue−8.6 % body weight at 16 weeks in a phase 1b multiple-ascending-dose study versus −1.7 % with placebosmall sample; confidence limits wideLow2
PramlintideAmylin analogue, short-acting−3.7 kg at 16 weeks versus placebo in a non-diabetic obesity studymodestLow1
5-amino-1MQSmall-molecule nicotinamide N-methyltransferase inhibitorNo human trial of any kind identifiedVery low0
Melanotan-IINon-selective melanocortin receptor agonist (cyclic…No randomised trial identifiedVery low0
MOTS-cMitochondrial-derived 16-residue peptideNo randomised controlled human trial identifiedVery low0
Estimates in this table are not on a common scale and must not be subtracted from one another. Where a comparison between two compounds has been made directly, it appears in a synthesis and not here.
Compounds assessed in ObesityPoint estimates with confidence intervals for each contributing study, plotted against the line of no effect.0.00.20.40.60.81.0Standardised direction and relative magnitudeCompoundEffect as recordedLiraglutideHigh certainty−8.0 % body weight at 56 weeks…SemaglutideHigh certainty−14.9 % body weight at 68 weeks…TirzepatideHigh certainty−20.9 % body weight at 72 weeks…AOD-9604Moderate certaintyA 12-week phase 2b trial in 300…CagrilintideModerate certainty−10.8 % body weight at 26 weeks…CagriSema (cagrilintid…Moderate certainty−22.7 % body weight at 68 weeks…DulaglutideModerate certainty−4.6 kg at 4.5 mg over 52 weeks…ExenatideModerate certainty−2.3 to −3.6 kgLixisenatideModerate certainty−1.8 to −2.7 kgMazdutideModerate certainty−14.4 % body weight at 48 weeks…OrforglipronModerate certainty−14.7 % body weight at 36 weeks…RetatrutideModerate certainty−24.2 % body weight at 48 weeks…
Moderate or high certaintyLow or very low certainty
Figure 1. Illustrative. Compounds assessed in this indication, plotted on a common standardised axis so that direction and relative magnitude can be compared at a glance. The estimates are not on a common natural scale and the intervals are the Institute's standardised representation of the reported precision rather than published confidence intervals.

§2.1Syntheses bearing on this indication

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, Greenway F, Halpern A, Krempf M, Lau DCW, le Roux CW, Violante Ortiz R, Jensen CB, Wilding JPH. A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. New England Journal of Medicine 2015;373(1):11–22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411892 · PMID 26132939
  2. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JFE, Nauck MA, Nissen SE, Pocock S, Poulter NR, Ravn LS, Steinberg WM, Stockner M, Zinman B, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine 2016;375(4):311–322. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1603827 · PMID 27295427

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.