Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · Safety review

Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin receptor agonists

What is the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and of discontinuation for adverse events with incretin receptor agonists compared with placebo?

Document identifier
CEI-ES-005
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
2.0
Published
12 May 2025
Last reviewed
12 Oct 2025
Next review
12 Apr 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.5
Certainty
High
Cycle
2025 Q2
Review type
Safety review
Search executed
05 Apr 2025

§1Abstract

§1.1Review question

What is the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and of discontinuation for adverse events with incretin receptor agonists compared with placebo?

§1.2PICO frame

Table 1. The registered PICO frame. Any change made after protocol registration is recorded in the amendment log at §5 and is identified there as post hoc.

ElementAs registered
PopulationAdults randomised in a placebo-controlled trial of an incretin receptor agonist.
InterventionAny incretin receptor agonist at any evaluated dose.
ComparatorPlacebo.
OutcomesNausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, discontinuation for adverse events, and serious gastrointestinal events including acute pancreatitis and gallbladder disease.

§1.3Method in brief

A review of harms, in which the absence of an event in a trial of conventional size is treated as uninformative rather than as reassurance. The protocol was registered with the Institute's secretariat before the search was executed. The search was run on 5 April 2025 across 8 sources and is reproduced in full at §2. Screening, extraction and certainty assessment were performed independently by two members of the secretariat with disagreement resolved by a third.[1,2]

§1.4Conclusion

High certainty evidence indicates that nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation are substantially more frequent with incretin receptor agonists than with placebo, that they are dose- and titration-rate-dependent, and that they attenuate with continued exposure in most but not all participants. Discontinuation for adverse events is consistently in the range of 4 to 10 % in injectable programmes and materially higher in the oral small-molecule programmes, where it has exceeded 50 % in some dose arms.

The conclusion rests on 24 contributing studies, listed with their extracted data at §3 and summarised outcome by outcome at §4.

§1.5Limitations

§1.6Consultation

This review was released for public comment before ratification. Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin receptor agonists received 12 submissions. Amendments arising are recorded in the amendment log and are traceable to a numbered submission.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, Davies M, Van Gaal LF, Lingvay I, McGowan BM, Rosenstock J, Tran MTD, Wadden TA, Wharton S, Yokote K, Zeuthen N, Kushner RF. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. New England Journal of Medicine 2021;384(11):989–1002. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2032183 · PMID 33567185
  2. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, Wharton S, Connery L, Alves B, Kiyosue A, Zhang S, Liu B, Bunck MC, Stefanski A. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. New England Journal of Medicine 2022;387(3):205–216. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2206038 · PMID 35658024

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.