Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · Intervention review

Amylin analogues as monotherapy and in combination

What is the effect of an amylin receptor agonist alone and in combination with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist on body weight?

Document identifier
CEI-ES-022
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
3.2
Published
10 Aug 2026
Last reviewed
10 Aug 2026
Next review
10 Feb 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.22
Certainty
Moderate
Cycle
2026 Q3
Review type
Intervention review
Search executed
10 Jun 2026

§1Abstract

§1.1Review question

What is the effect of an amylin receptor agonist alone and in combination with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist on body weight?

§1.2PICO frame

Table 1. The registered PICO frame. Any change made after protocol registration is recorded in the amendment log at §5 and is identified there as post hoc.

ElementAs registered
PopulationAdults with obesity, with and without type 2 diabetes.
InterventionCagrilintide, petrelintide or pramlintide alone or in fixed combination.
ComparatorPlacebo or the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist component alone.
OutcomesPercentage change in body weight; nausea; injection-site reactions.

§1.3Method in brief

A review of the effects of an intervention on pre-specified outcomes, with a quantitative synthesis where the contributing studies are sufficiently similar. The protocol was registered with the Institute's secretariat before the search was executed. The search was run on 10 June 2026 across 8 sources and is reproduced in full at §2. Screening, extraction and certainty assessment were performed independently by two members of the secretariat with disagreement resolved by a third.

§1.4Conclusion

Moderate certainty evidence indicates that a long-acting amylin analogue produces a weight reduction of roughly 8 to 11 % as monotherapy and that the fixed combination with semaglutide exceeds either component alone. Whether the combination effect exceeds what the same total incretin exposure would achieve is not established by any contributing trial, because no trial randomised participants to a dose-matched comparison of that kind. The Institute records the confirmatory combination result as smaller than the phase 2 estimate had implied.

The conclusion rests on 8 contributing studies, listed with their extracted data at §3 and summarised outcome by outcome at §4.

§1.5Limitations

§1.6Consultation

This review was released for public comment before ratification. Draft synthesis: Amylin analogues as monotherapy and in combination received 9 submissions. Amendments arising are recorded in the amendment log and are traceable to a numbered submission.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.