Maridebart cafraglutide in obesity and overweight in adults — evidence extract
The Institute's graded assessment of Maridebart cafraglutide for obesity and overweight in adults, with the contributing trials and the domain-by-domain certainty reasoning.
§1Evidence extract: Obesity and overweight in adults
§1.1Question and anchor outcome
- Population
- Excess adiposity sufficient to impair health, operationalised in the pivotal incretin programmes as a body-mass index of 30 kg/m² or above, or 27 kg/m² or above with at least one weight-related comorbidity.
- Intervention
- Maridebart cafraglutide, subcutaneous, monthly or less frequently
- Comparator
- As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
- Anchor outcome
- Percentage change in body weight from baseline
Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Proportion achieving ≥5 %, ≥10 %, ≥15 % and ≥20 % weight reduction; Change in waist circumference; Change in systolic blood pressure; Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
§1.2Contributing trials
Table 1. Trials contributing to the assessment of Maridebart cafraglutide in obesity and overweight in adults.
| Trial | Phase | Design | Randomised | Duration | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARITIDE-PH2-OBESITY | 2 | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 592 | 52 weeks | 2024 |
| MARITIDE-PH3 | 3 | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | — | 72 weeks | — |
§1.3Certainty assessment
Table 2. Reasoning recorded against each certainty domain.
| Domain | Rating | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Risk of bias | No concern | No serious concern identified in this domain. |
| Inconsistency | Very serious | Direction is consistent; magnitude varies with the intensity of the background intervention. |
| Indirectness | No concern | No serious concern identified in this domain. |
| Imprecision | No concern | No serious concern identified in this domain. |
| Publication bias | No concern | No serious concern identified in this domain. |
| Overall rating: Low certainty. Confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate. | ||
§1.4What this extract does not establish
References cited on this page
References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.
- Samms RJ, Coghlan MP, Sloop KW. How may GIP enhance the therapeutic efficacy of GLP-1?. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 2020;31(6):410–421. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2020.02.006 · PMID 32396843
- Coskun T, Sloop KW, Loghin C, Alsina-Fernandez J, Urva S, Bokvist KB, Cui X, Briere DA, Cabrera O, Roell WC, Kuchibhotla U, Moyers JS, Benson CT, Gimeno RE, D’Alessio DA, Haupt A. LY3298176, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: from discovery to clinical proof of concept. Molecular Metabolism 2018;18:3–14. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2018.09.009 · PMID 30473097
- Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, Wharton S, Connery L, Alves B, Kiyosue A, Zhang S, Liu B, Bunck MC, Stefanski A. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. New England Journal of Medicine 2022;387(3):205–216. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2206038 · PMID 35658024
Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.