Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions not accepted — page 2

The submission is not accepted. The secretariat response gives the reason. A submission that is not accepted remains published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.

Submissions

147 documents · page 2 of 5

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-PEOPLE-REGIS/009Draft policy on the register of members and reviewersHortensia Beauchamp-EkongRecusal should follow automatically from any declared financial interest
DRAFT-CORRECTIONS-/017Draft corrections and versioning policyDr Liesbeth QuennevilleAnonymous submissions should be accepted where the respondent risks employment consequences
DRAFT-CORRECTIONS-/008Draft corrections and versioning policyDr Theodora TrelawneyThe document set should be published in translation
DRAFT-STABILITY-ST/013Draft standard: freeze–thaw and in-use stability assessment of…Quentin Gwynne-SarpongThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-INDICATION-S/002Draft indication set and anchor outcomesDr Kamila Ubertini industryThe document should not describe uses outside the approved indication
DRAFT-MASH-SYNTHES/004Draft synthesis: incretin receptor agonists for metabolic…Dr Jacinta Steenkamp-FerreiraThe review question is drawn too broadly to be answerable
DRAFT-ADOLESCENT-S/007Draft synthesis: incretin receptor agonists in adolescentsDr Gervase AbergavennyThe review question is drawn too broadly to be answerable
DRAFT-ADOLESCENT-S/002Draft synthesis: incretin receptor agonists in adolescentsDr Liesbeth Nyquist-ObioraThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/003Draft analytical review: surveys of unregulated peptide supplyDr Zdenka Nyquist-ObioraThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/002Draft analytical review: surveys of unregulated peptide supplyProfessor Bartolomeu Nkosi-LindegaardThe review question is drawn too broadly to be answerable
DRAFT-REGISTRY-STR/006Draft structure of the document registryDr Anselm Thorsby-NakamuraThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-TOOLS-DISCLA/008Draft terms for the Institute’s calculatorsDr Stellan Cholmondeley-AdeThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-TOOLS-DISCLA/006Draft terms for the Institute’s calculatorsDr Ndidi Ravensworth-Ilunga industryThe document should not describe uses outside the approved indication
DRAFT-TOOLS-DISCLA/004Draft terms for the Institute’s calculatorsVittoria QuintanilhaRecusal should follow automatically from any declared financial interest
DRAFT-ORFORGLIPRON/008Draft monograph: orforglipronDr Jerome LavrentievThe document set should be published in translation
DRAFT-ORFORGLIPRON/002Draft monograph: orforglipronDr Wolfram Tollemache industryThe document should not describe uses outside the approved indication
DRAFT-METHODOLOGY-/001Draft methodology document, version 4Dr Theodora Ingelbrecht industryThe document should not describe uses outside the approved indication
DRAFT-METHODOLOGY-/016Draft methodology document, version 4Dr Ludmila TollemacheThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-METHODOLOGY-/004Draft methodology document, version 4Dr Jerome PetrossianThe document set should be published in translation
DRAFT-SUPPLIERS-CO/005Draft supplier comparison tableProfessor Ekaterina Voskresenskaya-Hill industryThe document should not describe uses outside the approved indication
DRAFT-RETATRUTIDE-/006Draft monograph: retatrutideDr Katarzyna YorkstoneThe monograph should state what the compound costs
DRAFT-RETATRUTIDE-/012Draft monograph: retatrutideDr Melisande Kirkpatrick-OlaThe document set should be published in translation
DRAFT-RETATRUTIDE-/010Draft monograph: retatrutideDr Kolawole Isaksen-Balogun industryThe document should not describe uses outside the approved indication
DRAFT-MELANOCORTIN/005Draft scoping review: melanocortin receptor agonistsDr Jolanta UttridgeThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/016Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis seriesDr Zofia PetrossianThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/014Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis seriesProfessor Bartolomeu Nkosi-LindegaardThe document set should be published in translation
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/003Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsDr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunThe document should state what a reader ought to do
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/018Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsVittoria QuintanilhaAnonymous submissions should be accepted where the respondent risks employment consequences
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/007Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsDr Emiliana OllerenshawRecusal should follow automatically from any declared financial interest
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/001Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsDr Ilona Mbatha-Fredriksen industryThe document should not describe uses outside the approved indication

page 2 of 5

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.