Consultation record
Submissions accepted in part
Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Submissions
377 documents · page 1 of 13
Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.
| Reference | Consultation | Respondent | Point raised |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/004 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Dr Katarzyna Oppenheimer-Ade | The database set omits sources relevant to the compounds in scope |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/006 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Dr Kamila Ubertini | Automated assistance in screening should be disclosed and validated |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/002 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Dr Anselm Ashworth-Danquah | The treatment of sponsor-conducted evidence is unworkable where all the evidence is… |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/010 | Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework… | Dr Ottoline Oppenheimer-Ade | The conditions for upgrading observational evidence are too permissive |
| DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/001 | Draft supplier evaluation rubric | Dr Adaeze Dunmore-Ekpo | Scores are reported to a precision the underlying judgements do not support |
| DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/003 | Draft supplier evaluation rubric | Dr Rosalind Grünbaum-Sowande | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/009 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Dr Quintus Rautavaara | Nothing requires a laboratory to demonstrate ongoing performance |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/010 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Dr Gervase Crickhowell | Nothing in the standard addresses transfer of the method between laboratories |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/004 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Zdenka Ximenes | Results are reported without an estimate of measurement uncertainty |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/005 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Dr Hamish Nyquist-Obiora | References should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source |
| DRAFT-COA-MINIMUM-/011 | Draft certificate-of-analysis minimum data standard | Vittoria Quintanilha | Acceptance criteria are expressed in terms specific to one instrument family |
| DRAFT-RP-HPLC-PURI/005 | Draft standard: determination of chromatographic purity by… | Dr Wilhelmina Quaresma | Nothing in the standard addresses transfer of the method between laboratories |
| DRAFT-RP-HPLC-PURI/003 | Draft standard: determination of chromatographic purity by… | Dr Eamon Sandringham-Adu industry | The additional determinations required would materially increase release testing cost |
| DRAFT-SEMAGLUTIDE-/011 | Draft monograph: semaglutide, version 3 | Dr Prosper Vercingetorix | Trials are described as terminated where they completed as planned |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/006 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Dr Jolyon Grünbaum-Sowande | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/010 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Dr Hyacinth Oyelaran-Steen | Where the compound is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, the cardiovascular outcome… |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/002 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Rosalind Petrossian | The analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompanies |
| DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/007 | Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 | Dr Dmitri Nordhagen | References should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/007 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Dr Anselm Ashworth-Danquah | Studies not published in English were excluded without assessment |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/012 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Dr Ottoline Oppenheimer-Ade | The choice of effect measure is not justified and changes the appearance of the result |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/001 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Dr Anselm Thorsby-Nakamura industry | A sponsor trial meeting the eligibility criteria was excluded |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/003 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Dr Mordecai Glendinning-Uche | Two included studies do not meet the registered eligibility criteria |
| DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/010 | Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin… | Dr Theodora Trelawney | A surrogate outcome is used as the anchor without validation evidence |
| DRAFT-NETWORK-TRAN/007 | Draft methodological review: transitivity in the incretin network | Dr Wilhelmina Erlingsson | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-NETWORK-TRAN/006 | Draft methodological review: transitivity in the incretin network | Dr Gervase Crickhowell | The review protocol is described but its registration record is not linked |
| DRAFT-NETWORK-TRAN/008 | Draft methodological review: transitivity in the incretin network | Dr Adaeze Dunmore-Ekpo | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/006 | Draft conflicts-of-interest policy | Dr Jolyon Grünbaum-Sowande | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/007 | Draft conflicts-of-interest policy | Dr Dmitri Nordhagen | The secretariat answers submissions and is not itself named |
| DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/012 | Draft conflicts-of-interest policy | Dr Amara Vandergraaf | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/008 | Draft conflicts-of-interest policy | Dr Liesbeth Quenneville | A party criticised in an assessment should have a right of reply |
page 1 of 13