Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §6–7

Glutathione — analytical characterisation

Chromatographic conditions, identity, related substances, presentation, reconstitution and in-use stability.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-046/6
Series
Compound monograph
Version
1.3
Published
06 May 2026
Last reviewed
06 May 2026
Next review
06 May 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.46
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2026 Q2

§6Analytical characterisation

§6.1Chromatographic conditions

Column
C18 with an aqueous-compatible phase, or ion-pairing; glutathione is very polar and poorly retained
Mobile phase and gradient
A: 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid or 25 mM phosphate pH 2.5 in water; B: methanol. Gradient 0–20 % B over 12 min
Detection
UV 214 nm; the compound has no useful chromophore above 230 nm. Electrochemical detection or derivatisation with a thiol-specific reagent gives far better sensitivity and, importantly, distinguishes the reduced thiol from the oxidised disulfide
Retention
Very early
Representative chromatographic traceIllustrative ultraviolet chromatogram at 214 nanometres showing the main peak and related substances.051015202530Retention time (minutes)Absorbance, 214 nm98.16 % area
Figure 7. Illustrative. Representative ultraviolet trace at 214 nanometres constructed by the Institute to show the relationship between a main peak, its related substances and the reported area percentage. The trace is generated from a seeded model and is not a chromatogram of any material. It is published to make the integration question concrete: the same material analysed on a shallower gradient would resolve peaks that this trace co-elutes, and would report a lower purity.

§6.2Identity by mass spectrometry

[M+H]⁺ at m/z 308.1; [M−H]⁻ at m/z 306.1. Oxidised glutathione disulfide gives [M+H]⁺ at m/z 613.2.[3]

§6.3Related substances and degradation

Table 7. Related substances recorded for Glutathione, with the process or storage route that generates each and its analytical signature.

Related substanceOriginAnalytical signature
Glutathione disulfide (GSSG)OxidationThe dominant impurity and degradant. It forms spontaneously in air and in solution. The reduced-to-oxidised ratio is the single most important quality attribute for this compound and a purity figure that does not distinguish the two forms is uninformative
Cysteinylglycine and free amino acidsHydrolysisDetected in the same method
S-conjugatesReaction with electrophiles present in processingVariable mass additions
Heavy metalsThiols chelate metals avidlyElemental impurity determination is appropriate and is not generally performed
EndotoxinIf intended for parenteral useEssential and not reported in this channel
Degradation routes
  • Oxidation of the thiol to the disulfide is rapid in air and in neutral aqueous solution, and is catalysed by trace metals
  • Hydrolysis of the glycine amide bond
  • Racemisation is not a significant route

§7Presentation, reconstitution and storage

§7.1Presentation and reconstitution

Presentation
Crystalline or lyophilised powder; authorised injectable presentations in some jurisdictions
Reconstitution
A 600 mg vial with 6 mL gives 100 mg/mL. Solutions oxidise measurably within hours; preparation immediately before use is required and the addition of a chelator such as EDTA slows metal-catalysed oxidation.
Storage, lyophilised
2–8 °C, desiccated, protected from air. The solid is more stable than the solution but still oxidises slowly
Storage, reconstituted
Use immediately. The Institute publishes no in-use claim
In-use period
Immediate use only

Glutathione makes a point that applies across this whole series in an unusually visible way: for a compound whose activity resides in a single reactive functional group, the relevant specification is the state of that group, not a chromatographic area percentage.

§7.2In-use stability

Applicable standards: CEI-MS-01 · CEI-MS-02 · CEI-MS-03 · CEI-MS-04 · CEI-MS-05 · CEI-MS-06. The full series is at methodological standards.

Working calculators: reconstitution and insulin-unit conversion · purity against peptide content · certificate minimum-data checker.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute
  2. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2023;Step 4 version, 1 November 2023. identifier not held by the Institute
  3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 1999;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  4. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 2003;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  5. Manning MC, Chou DK, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Katayama DS. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update. Pharmaceutical Research 2010;27(4):544–575. doi:10.1007/s11095-009-0045-6 · PMID 20143256

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.