Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · Intervention review

Thymosin alpha-1 in immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy: effect on the anchor outcome

In the population defined for immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy, what is the effect of Thymosin alpha-1 compared with the comparator used in its contributing trials on the anchor outcome for this indication?

Document identifier
CEI-ES-048
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
2.2
Published
09 Jun 2026
Last reviewed
09 Jun 2026
Next review
09 Dec 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.48
Certainty
Moderate
Cycle
2026 Q2
Review type
Intervention review
Search executed
18 Apr 2026

Templated review frame. This review question was generated by crossing an indication with a compound for which contributing trials exist. Its prose frame is templated and is shared with other questions of the same shape. Its included studies, its summary of findings and its certainty rating are computed from the underlying records and are not templated. The Institute publishes these questions because the alternative is to leave a question the document set can answer unanswered, and it labels them because the alternative is to present a templated frame as an authored one.

§1Abstract

§1.1Review question

In the population defined for immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy, what is the effect of Thymosin alpha-1 compared with the comparator used in its contributing trials on the anchor outcome for this indication?

§1.2PICO frame

Table 1. The registered PICO frame. Any change made after protocol registration is recorded in the amendment log at §5 and is identified there as post hoc.

ElementAs registered
PopulationPharmacological modification of innate or adaptive immune function, assessed by cell counts, functional assays and clinical infection or oncological endpoints.
InterventionThymosin alpha-1 administered as subcutaneous.
ComparatorThe comparator used in each contributing trial, reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types.
OutcomesAnchor outcome for this indication: CD4 and CD8 counts. Additional outcomes: Response to vaccination; Infection incidence; Tumour response where applicable.

§1.3Method in brief

A review of the effects of an intervention on pre-specified outcomes, with a quantitative synthesis where the contributing studies are sufficiently similar. The protocol was registered with the Institute's secretariat before the search was executed. The search was run on 18 April 2026 across 8 sources and is reproduced in full at §2. Screening, extraction and certainty assessment were performed independently by two members of the secretariat with disagreement resolved by a third.[1,2]

§1.4Conclusion

Moderate certainty evidence from 4 contributing trials bears on the effect of Thymosin alpha-1 on the anchor outcome for immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy. The estimate the Institute carries in the monograph is: Meta-analyses of hepatitis B trials report higher sustained virological response with thymosin alpha-1 as monotherapy or adjunct; a large Chinese randomised trial in sepsis reported a mortality difference that a subsequent larger trial did not confirm. Rated moderate for the immune-reconstitution effect on lymphocyte subsets, which is consistently reproduced, and low for any clinical outcome, which is not. The Institute separates these two claims deliberately.

The conclusion rests on 4 contributing studies, listed with their extracted data at §3 and summarised outcome by outcome at §4.

§1.5Limitations

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Garaci E, Pica F, Serafino A, Balestrieri E, Matteucci C, Moroni G, Sorrentino R, Zonfrillo M, Pierimarchi P, Sinibaldi-Vallebona P. Thymosin α1 and cancer: action on immune effector and tumor target cells. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2007;1112:225–234. doi:10.1196/annals.1415.025 · PMID 17567944
  2. D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2014;101:2–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012 · PMID 25044089

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.