Oral compared with injectable presentations of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonism — included and excluded studies
The included-studies table with extracted data, the exclusions with reasons, and the risk-of-bias judgements.
§3Included and excluded studies
Every study contributing to this review is listed below with the data extracted from it. The extraction table is published at the level of the individual outcome and study so that the synthesis can be checked without the reader having to retrieve each source.
§3.1Included studies
Table 4. Included studies with the characteristics extracted from each.
| Study | Design | Randomised | Duration | Anchor outcome as reported | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACHIEVE-1Orforglipron | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | — | 40 weeks | no result held | 2025 |
| ACHIEVE-2Orforglipron | Randomised, double-blind, active-controlled | — | 52 weeks | no result held | 2025 |
| ATTAIN-1Orforglipron | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | — | 72 weeks | The Institute holds a headline result indicating a weight effect intermediate between the injectable single agonists and placebo, and awaits the full… | 2025 |
| ATTAIN-2Orforglipron | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | — | 72 weeks | no result held | 2025 |
| SOULSemaglutide, oral | Event-driven cardiovascular outcome trial | 9,650 | Median 47.5 months | Hazard ratio 0.86 (95 % CI 0.77 to 0.96) | 2025 |
| STRIDESemaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 792 | 52 weeks | Estimated treatment ratio 1.13 (95 % CI 1.06 to 1.21) | 2025 |
| FLOWSemaglutide | Event-driven kidney outcome trial | 3,533 | Median 3.4 years | Hazard ratio 0.76 (95 % CI 0.66 to 0.88); annual eGFR slope difference 1.16 mL/min/1.73 m² per year | 2024 |
| STEP-HFpEF-DMSemaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 616 | 52 weeks | Directionally consistent with STEP-HFpEF with a smaller weight effect, as expected in a population with diabetes | 2024 |
| DANU-PH2B-OBESITYDanuglipron | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 605 | 32 weeks | Dose-dependent weight reduction accompanied by discontinuation rates above 50 % in some arms; development in obesity was subsequently discontinued | 2023 |
| DANU-PH2B-T2DDanuglipron | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 411 | 16 weeks | Glycaemic effect demonstrated; the programme was discontinued for tolerability and hepatic-safety reasons | 2023 |
| OASIS-1Semaglutide, oral | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 667 | 68 weeks | Mean change −15.1 % versus −2.4 % with placebo | 2023 |
| ORFO-PH2-OBESITYOrforglipron | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 272 | 36 weeks | Mean change up to −14.7 % versus −2.3 % with placebo | 2023 |
| ORFO-PH2-T2DOrforglipron | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 383 | 26 weeks | Reduction of up to 2.1 percentage points versus 0.4 with placebo | 2023 |
| SELECTSemaglutide | Event-driven cardiovascular outcome trial | 17,604 | Mean 39.8 months | Hazard ratio 0.80 (95 % CI 0.72 to 0.90); 6.5 % versus 8.0 % | 2023 |
| STEP-HFpEFSemaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 529 | 52 weeks | Clinical summary score improved 16.6 points versus 8.7 points with placebo; estimated difference 7.8 points (95 % CI 4.8 to 10.9) | 2023 |
| STEP-5Semaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 304 | 104 weeks | Mean change −15.2 % versus −2.6 % with placebo; the longest randomised exposure in the programme | 2022 |
| STEP-8Semaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, active-controlled | 338 | 68 weeks | Mean change −15.8 % with semaglutide versus −6.4 % with liraglutide; difference −9.4 percentage points (95 % CI −12.0 to −6.8) | 2022 |
| STEP-1Semaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 1,961 | 68 weeks | Mean change −14.9 % with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus −2.4 % with placebo; treatment difference −12.4 percentage points (95 % CI −13.4 to −11.5) | 2021 |
| STEP-2Semaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 1,210 | 68 weeks | Mean change −9.6 % with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus −3.4 % with placebo; the effect is attenuated relative to STEP 1, which the Institute records as a consistent… | 2021 |
| STEP-3Semaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 611 | 68 weeks | Mean change −16.0 % with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus −5.7 % with placebo | 2021 |
| STEP-4Semaglutide | Randomised withdrawal | 803 | 48 weeks after a 20-week run-in | Continued treatment −7.9 % versus +6.9 % after switching to placebo; the Institute reads this as evidence that the effect is maintained by continued exposure… | 2021 |
| PIONEER-1Semaglutide, oral | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled | 703 | 26 weeks | Dose-dependent reduction of 0.6 to 1.1 percentage points versus placebo | 2019 |
| PIONEER-6Semaglutide, oral | Event-driven cardiovascular outcome trial | 3,183 | Median 15.9 months | Hazard ratio 0.79 (95 % CI 0.57 to 1.11); the trial was designed and powered to exclude harm, not to establish benefit, and the Institute reports it as such | 2019 |
| SUSTAIN-7Semaglutide | Randomised, double-blind, active-controlled | 1,201 | 40 weeks | Difference −0.41 percentage points (95 % CI −0.57 to −0.25) for semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg | 2018 |
| 24 included studies. Each links to its structured abstract, which carries a field-by-field provenance table distinguishing extracted figures from Institute reconstructions. | |||||
Contributing participants across studies reporting a randomised total: 45,376. Studies for which the Institute does not hold a randomised total contribute to the qualitative synthesis and not to any pooled figure.
§3.2Excluded at full text, with reasons
Table 5. Reports excluded at full text, by reason. A review that reports an exclusion count without reasons cannot be checked against its own protocol.
| Reason for exclusion | Reports |
|---|---|
| Not a randomised comparison | 5 |
| Population outside the review question | 8 |
| Intervention outside the review question | 7 |
| Comparator not eligible | 5 |
| No eligible outcome reported | 4 |
| Duplicate report of an included study | 3 |
| Conference abstract without extractable data | 11 |
| Retracted or subject to an expression of concern | 12 |
| 46 reports excluded at full text in total. | |
§3.3Risk of bias across included studies
Table 6. Risk-of-bias judgement recorded for each included study on the review's anchor outcome.
| Study | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACHIEVE-1 | Low | Low | Some | Some | Low |
| ACHIEVE-2 | Some | Low | Some | Low | Low |
| ATTAIN-1 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Some |
| ATTAIN-2 | Low | Low | Some | Some | Low |
| SOUL | Low | Low | Some | Low | Low |
| STRIDE | Some | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| FLOW | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| STEP-HFpEF-DM | Low | Low | Low | Low | Some |
| DANU-PH2B-OBESITY | Low | Low | Low | Some | Some |
| DANU-PH2B-T2D | Low | Low | Low | Some | Some |
| OASIS-1 | Low | Some | Low | Low | Low |
| ORFO-PH2-OBESITY | Low | Low | Some | Low | Low |
| ORFO-PH2-T2D | Low | Some | Low | Low | Low |
| SELECT | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Judgements are the Institute's own and are recorded per outcome. A study may carry a different judgement in a different review that assesses a different outcome from it. | |||||