Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · §5

Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin receptor agonists — amendment log

Every change made since protocol registration, with its date and reason.

Document identifier
CEI-ES-005/5
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
2.0
Published
12 May 2025
Last reviewed
12 Oct 2025
Next review
12 Apr 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.5
Certainty
High
Cycle
2025 Q2
Review type
Safety review
Search executed
05 Apr 2025

§5Amendment log

Every change made to this review after protocol registration is recorded below with its date and its reason. A change that is not in this log did not happen. The Institute publishes the log in full, including changes that did not alter a conclusion, because a reader cannot judge which changes matter unless all of them are visible.

§5.1Amendment log

Table 9. Amendments to this review since protocol registration.

DateVersionAmendmentRecord
17 Mar 20250.1Protocol registeredThe review protocol was registered with the Institute’s secretariat before the search was executed. No change to the review question was made after registration.
02 Aug 20252.1Certainty rating revisedThe certainty rating for one outcome was revised following the addition of a contributing study. The rationale is recorded in the certainty assessment section.
08 Dec 20252.2Analysis method changedThe pooling method was changed from a fixed-effect to a random-effects model following observation of between-study heterogeneity exceeding the pre-specified threshold.
24 Mar 20262.3Comment-period disposition appliedAmendments arising from the disposition of a public comment period were applied. Each amendment is traceable to a numbered submission.
20 Jun 20262.0Outcome addedAn additional outcome was added at the request of a public comment-period respondent. The addition is recorded here because it was made after protocol registration and is therefore post hoc.
Current version 2.0, ratified in the 2025 Q2 assessment cycle.

§5.2Clinical study report requests

Table 10. Clinical study reports requested for the contributing trials, and the outcome of each request. Refusals are recorded because a review that does not record them presents the sponsor's disclosure decision as the Institute's own.

TrialRequestedOutcome
ACHIEVE-111 Mar 2025Partially supplied
ACHIEVE-209 Jan 2025Redirected to a data-access portal
ATTAIN-125 Jan 2025Refused
ATTAIN-225 Feb 2025No response
STRIDE10 Feb 2025No response
SURMOUNT-514 Jan 2025No response
SURMOUNT-KOA12 Mar 2025No response
SURPASS-CVOT02 Mar 2025Refused

§5.3Superseded versions

Superseded versions of this review remain published at a stable address, are marked as superseded, and link forward to the current version. The current version links back to each of them. That practice was adopted following a submission that a document cited in the literature must remain retrievable in the form in which it was cited; the reasoning is published on the corrections policy disposition page.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, Davies M, Van Gaal LF, Lingvay I, McGowan BM, Rosenstock J, Tran MTD, Wadden TA, Wharton S, Yokote K, Zeuthen N, Kushner RF. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. New England Journal of Medicine 2021;384(11):989–1002. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2032183 · PMID 33567185

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.