Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §6–7

TB-500 — analytical characterisation

Chromatographic conditions, identity, related substances, presentation, reconstitution and in-use stability.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-031/6
Series
Compound monograph
Version
4.1
Published
13 Oct 2025
Last reviewed
13 Oct 2025
Next review
13 Oct 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.31
Certainty
Very low
Cycle
2025 Q4

§6Analytical characterisation

§6.1Chromatographic conditions

Column
C18, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm; aqueous-compatible phase required
Mobile phase and gradient
A: 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid in water; B: acetonitrile. Gradient 2–25 % B over 20 min — an extremely polar peptide requiring a near-aqueous starting condition
Detection
UV 214 nm only. No aromatic residue is present; 280 nm detection is impossible and a 280 nm purity figure is erroneous
Retention
Very early. Retention is so poor on conventional methods that void-region coelution is the principal source of overstated purity for this compound
Representative chromatographic traceIllustrative ultraviolet chromatogram at 214 nanometres showing the main peak and related substances.051015202530Retention time (minutes)Absorbance, 214 nm98.21 % area
Figure 7. Illustrative. Representative ultraviolet trace at 214 nanometres constructed by the Institute to show the relationship between a main peak, its related substances and the reported area percentage. The trace is generated from a seeded model and is not a chromatogram of any material. It is published to make the integration question concrete: the same material analysed on a shallower gradient would resolve peaks that this trace co-elutes, and would report a lower purity.

§6.2Identity by mass spectrometry

[M+H]⁺ at m/z 861.5. Average mass 860.0 ± 1 Da. The distinction from full-length thymosin beta-4 at 4963 Da is unmistakable at any resolution, so substitution between the two is a labelling failure and not an analytical limitation.[3]

§6.3Related substances and degradation

Table 7. Related substances recorded for TB-500, with the process or storage route that generates each and its analytical signature.

Related substanceOriginAnalytical signature
Full-length thymosin beta-4Substitution or mislabelling+4103 Da — trivially distinguishable, yet the Institute has recorded this substitution
Non-acetylated LKKTETQFailed acetylation−42 Da; the acetyl group is the only stabilising modification present and its absence is material
Des-Leu1 truncationIncomplete coupling−113 Da
Pyroglutamate at the C-terminal GlnCyclisation on storage−17 Da
Counter-ionPurificationTwo lysines; counter-ion content is proportionally very large on an 860 Da peptide and may exceed 15 % by mass in poorly desalted material
Degradation routes
  • C-terminal glutamine cyclisation to pyroglutamate
  • Deamidation of Gln7
  • No oxidation-sensitive residues
  • Aminopeptidase susceptibility in any biological matrix

§7Presentation, reconstitution and storage

§7.1Presentation and reconstitution

Presentation
Lyophilised powder in vial (research supply only)
Reconstitution
A 5 mg vial with 2.5 mL gives 2 mg/mL; 2 mg is then 1.0 mL, that is 100 units on a U-100 syringe — the full barrel of a standard insulin syringe.
Storage, lyophilised
−20 °C, desiccated
Storage, reconstituted
2–8 °C; no supported in-use claim
In-use period
No supported claim

The very large counter-ion fraction typical of small polybasic peptides means the peptide-content figure matters more here than the purity figure. A vial labelled 5 mg may contain appreciably less than 5 mg of peptide, entirely legitimately, and the certificate is where that is disclosed or is not.

§7.2In-use stability

Applicable standards: CEI-MS-01 · CEI-MS-02 · CEI-MS-03 · CEI-MS-04 · CEI-MS-05 · CEI-MS-06. The full series is at methodological standards.

Working calculators: reconstitution and insulin-unit conversion · purity against peptide content · certificate minimum-data checker.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute
  2. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2023;Step 4 version, 1 November 2023. identifier not held by the Institute
  3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 1999;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  4. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 2003;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  5. Manning MC, Chou DK, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Katayama DS. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update. Pharmaceutical Research 2010;27(4):544–575. doi:10.1007/s11095-009-0045-6 · PMID 20143256

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.