Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §6–7

CJC-1295 — analytical characterisation

Chromatographic conditions, identity, related substances, presentation, reconstitution and in-use stability.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-023/6
Series
Compound monograph
Version
2.1
Published
14 May 2023
Last reviewed
14 Jul 2024
Next review
14 Jul 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.23
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2023 Q2

§6Analytical characterisation

§6.1Chromatographic conditions

Column
C18, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm
Mobile phase and gradient
A: 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid in water; B: acetonitrile. Gradient 20–50 % B over 35 min
Detection
UV 214 nm; 280 nm (Tyr1, Tyr10)
Retention
The DAC variant is more hydrophobic and retains longer; the two variants are readily resolved chromatographically, which means a laboratory that reports only a single unnamed peak has chosen not to make the distinction
Representative chromatographic traceIllustrative ultraviolet chromatogram at 214 nanometres showing the main peak and related substances.051015202530Retention time (minutes)Absorbance, 214 nm98.36 % area
Figure 7. Illustrative. Representative ultraviolet trace at 214 nanometres constructed by the Institute to show the relationship between a main peak, its related substances and the reported area percentage. The trace is generated from a seeded model and is not a chromatogram of any material. It is published to make the integration question concrete: the same material analysed on a shallower gradient would resolve peaks that this trace co-elutes, and would report a lower purity.

§6.2Identity by mass spectrometry

Expected deconvoluted average mass 3647 Da (DAC) or 3368 Da (modified GRF(1-29)). These are separated by 279 Da — a difference no instrument in routine use could miss. The Institute therefore treats variant misidentification as a reporting failure rather than an analytical limitation.[3]

§6.3Related substances and degradation

Table 7. Related substances recorded for CJC-1295, with the process or storage route that generates each and its analytical signature.

Related substanceOriginAnalytical signature
Wrong variantThe dominant finding−279 Da or +279 Da relative to the labelled variant
Hydrolysed maleimide (DAC variant)Storage in aqueous conditions+18 Da; the hydrolysed maleamic acid cannot conjugate to albumin, so the compound loses its entire pharmacokinetic advantage while retaining almost the same mass and retention time. This is the most insidious quality failure for the DAC variant and requires deliberate method design to detect
Maleimide-thiol adductsReaction with free thiols during processingVariable mass increase
C-terminal free acidIncomplete amidation+0.98 Da
Truncated chainsIncomplete couplingLadder pattern
Degradation routes
  • Maleimide hydrolysis is the critical route for the DAC variant and is rapid in aqueous solution at neutral pH
  • Methionine-free sequence, so oxidation is a minor route
  • Deamidation of Gln residues
  • Loss of the C-terminal amide

§7Presentation, reconstitution and storage

§7.1Presentation and reconstitution

Presentation
Lyophilised powder in vial (research supply only)
Reconstitution
A 5 mg vial with 2.0 mL gives 2.5 mg/mL; a 100 µg quantity is then 0.04 mL, that is 4 units on a U-100 syringe — at the lower limit of reliable measurement, which argues for a larger reconstitution volume.
Storage, lyophilised
−20 °C, desiccated and protected from light
Storage, reconstituted
For the DAC variant, the Institute notes that maleimide hydrolysis proceeds in aqueous solution regardless of refrigeration, so reconstituted material loses conjugation capacity over days even when purity by reverse phase appears unchanged
In-use period
No supported in-use claim

This compound is the clearest case in the series where a conventional purity certificate can be entirely accurate and simultaneously uninformative: a hydrolysed-maleimide preparation may assay above 98 % pure and be pharmacologically inert.

§7.2In-use stability

Applicable standards: CEI-MS-01 · CEI-MS-02 · CEI-MS-03 · CEI-MS-04 · CEI-MS-05 · CEI-MS-06. The full series is at methodological standards.

Working calculators: reconstitution and insulin-unit conversion · purity against peptide content · certificate minimum-data checker.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute
  2. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2023;Step 4 version, 1 November 2023. identifier not held by the Institute
  3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 1999;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  4. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 2003;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  5. Manning MC, Chou DK, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Katayama DS. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update. Pharmaceutical Research 2010;27(4):544–575. doi:10.1007/s11095-009-0045-6 · PMID 20143256

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.