Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §10

BPC-157 — references and citing documents

The full reference list for this monograph, and every Institute document that draws on it.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-030/10
Series
Compound monograph
Version
1.2
Published
11 Jan 2023
Last reviewed
11 May 2024
Next review
11 May 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.30
Certainty
Very low
Cycle
2023 Q1

§10References

Every reference the monograph relies on is listed below in order of first citation across the document. Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them; where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed one.

This monograph cites 5 sources[1,2,3,4,5].

Table 9. Bibliographic records for the sources cited by this monograph. Each links to its record page, which lists every Institute document citing it.

§11Related Institute documents

Table 10. Institute documents that draw on, or are drawn on by, this monograph.

Numbered reference list

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Sikiric P, Seiwerth S, Rucman R, Turkovic B, Rokotov DS, Brcic L, Sever M, Klicek R, Radic B, Drmic D, Ilic S, Kolenc D, Aralica G, Stupnisek M, Suran J, Barisic I, Dzidic S, Prkacin I. Stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157: novel therapy in gastrointestinal tract. Current Pharmaceutical Design 2011;17(16):1612–1632. doi:10.2174/138161211796196954 · PMID 21548867
  2. Bhattacharyya S, Wang J, Kaplan RM. Quality of peptide products obtained from unregulated online suppliers: an analytical survey. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2024;113(4):1102–1110. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2023.11.021 Cited by the Institute as an indicative analytical survey; sample frame was not random.
  3. Carvalho M, Dinis-Oliveira RJ. Analytical and forensic aspects of counterfeit peptide hormones. Drug Testing and Analysis 2023;15(1):5–19. doi:10.1002/dta.3379
  4. Thevis M, Thomas A, Schänzer W. Detecting peptidic drugs, drug candidates and analogs in sports doping: current status and future directions. Expert Review of Proteomics 2019;11(6):663–673. doi:10.1586/14789450.2014.965158
  5. D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2014;101:2–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012 · PMID 25044089

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.