Tendon, ligament and musculoskeletal soft-tissue injury — evidence across compounds
Every compound the Institute assesses in tendon, ligament and musculoskeletal soft-tissue injury, with its certainty rating.
§2Evidence across compounds
Every compound the Institute assesses in this indication, with the effect as recorded, the certainty rating and the contributing trials. Effects are reported on the anchor outcome where the contributing trials measured it and on the outcome the trial actually reported where they did not.
Table 1. Compounds assessed in tendon, ligament and musculoskeletal soft-tissue injury, ordered by certainty.
| Compound | Effect as recorded | Interval as reported | Certainty | Trials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPC-157Synthetic pentadecapeptide derived from a gastric juice… | No randomised controlled human trial identified | — | Very low | 0 |
| TB-500Acetylated heptapeptide fragment of thymosin beta-4 | No randomised controlled human trial identified | — | Very low | 0 |
| Estimates in this table are not on a common scale and must not be subtracted from one another. Where a comparison between two compounds has been made directly, it appears in a synthesis and not here. | ||||
§2.1Syntheses bearing on this indication
- Human evidence for BPC-157 — Very low
References cited on this page
References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.
- Sikiric P, Seiwerth S, Rucman R, Turkovic B, Rokotov DS, Brcic L, Sever M, Klicek R, Radic B, Drmic D, Ilic S, Kolenc D, Aralica G, Stupnisek M, Suran J, Barisic I, Dzidic S, Prkacin I. Stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157: novel therapy in gastrointestinal tract. Current Pharmaceutical Design 2011;17(16):1612–1632. doi:10.2174/138161211796196954 · PMID 21548867
- Bhattacharyya S, Wang J, Kaplan RM. Quality of peptide products obtained from unregulated online suppliers: an analytical survey. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2024;113(4):1102–1110. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2023.11.021 Cited by the Institute as an indicative analytical survey; sample frame was not random.
Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.