Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Trial abstract · Institute-constructed programme record

SUSTAIN-1-QOL — structured trial abstract

SUSTAIN-1 patient-reported outcome sub-study — Semaglutide

Document identifier
CEI-TR-0164
Series
Trial abstract
Version
1.0
Published
27 Feb 2023
Last reviewed
27 Jul 2023
Next review
27 Jul 2025
Identifier
10.71829/cei.trial.164
Certainty
Very low
Cycle
2023 Q1
Phase
Phase 3
Status
Reported

Institute-constructed programme record. This document is not a report of a published trial. It is a record the Institute has constructed to represent an instalment, sub-study or extension of a real development programme, published in order to carry a methodological point that the parent trial report does not address. No effect estimate on this page is attributable to any publication, and its reference-list entry carries a programme-record label rather than a citation. The policy governing these records was settled through a public comment period.

§1Structured abstract

§1.1Objective

To evaluate Semaglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus, against the comparator specified in §2, with the primary endpoint stated below.

§1.2Design

Design
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group
Masking
Double-blind (participant, investigator and sponsor)
Phase
Phase 3
Randomised participants
not recorded by the Institute
Duration of the primary analysis period
As stated in the parent protocol
Sponsor class
Manufacturer-sponsored
Registry identifier
not reproduced — see the note in §1.5

§1.3Primary endpoint

Change in a validated patient-reported outcome instrument

§1.4Principal result

This is an Institute-constructed programme record and reports no effect estimate. Its purpose is set out in §1.6.

§1.5Provenance of this abstract

Table 1. Field-by-field provenance. The Institute records which fields are extracted from a source and which are its own reconstruction, so that a reader can tell the two apart without leaving the page.

FieldProvenanceNote
Design, phase, duration, primary endpointConstructedConstructed by the Institute for this programme record.
Randomised participantsNot heldNot recorded by the Institute. The field is left empty rather than estimated.
Principal resultNot heldNo result is reproduced.
Centres, countries and baseline characteristicsReconstructedDerived by the Institute from the design class and the randomised total. Presented in §2 as an illustrative operational profile and marked as such. These figures are not published characteristics of this trial.
Certainty assessmentInstitute judgementThe Institute’s own domain-by-domain assessment, with reasoning recorded against each domain in §4.
Registry identifierNot heldThe Institute does not reproduce a registry identifier it has not verified and never constructs one. Documents are referenced by the Institute’s own identifier.

§1.6Why this record exists

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.