Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Trial abstract

LL37-PH1-2-VENOUSULCER — structured trial abstract

LL37-PH1-2-VENOUSULCER — LL-37 in wound healing: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Document identifier
CEI-TR-0116
Series
Trial abstract
Version
2.4
Published
21 Mar 2023
Last reviewed
21 Nov 2023
Next review
21 Nov 2025
Identifier
10.71829/cei.trial.116
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2023 Q1
Phase
Phase 1/2
Status
Reported

§1Structured abstract

§1.1Objective

To evaluate LL-37 in cutaneous wound healing and tissue repair, against the comparator specified in §2, with the primary endpoint stated below.

§1.2Design

Design
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group
Masking
Double-blind (participant, investigator and sponsor)
Phase
Phase 1/2
Randomised participants
34
Duration of the primary analysis period
4 weeks
Sponsor class
Manufacturer-sponsored
Registry identifier
not reproduced — see the note in §1.5

§1.3Primary endpoint

Change in ulcer area after topical administration

§1.4Principal result

A dose-dependent reduction in ulcer area at the low and intermediate doses only, with no effect at the highest dose.

A non-monotonic dose–response is a finding the Institute reports rather than smooths over.

§1.5Provenance of this abstract

Table 1. Field-by-field provenance. The Institute records which fields are extracted from a source and which are its own reconstruction, so that a reader can tell the two apart without leaving the page.

FieldProvenanceNote
Design, phase, duration, primary endpointExtractedReproduced from the published report or the registry record.
Randomised participantsExtractedReproduced as published.
Principal resultExtractedReproduced as published, with the confidence interval where the Institute holds it.
Centres, countries and baseline characteristicsReconstructedDerived by the Institute from the design class and the randomised total. Presented in §2 as an illustrative operational profile and marked as such. These figures are not published characteristics of this trial.
Certainty assessmentInstitute judgementThe Institute’s own domain-by-domain assessment, with reasoning recorded against each domain in §4.
Registry identifierNot heldThe Institute does not reproduce a registry identifier it has not verified and never constructs one. Documents are referenced by the Institute’s own identifier.
Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.