Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · Intervention review

Thymic peptides in infection and immune support

What is the evidence for thymic peptides in chronic viral hepatitis, sepsis and non-specific immune support?

Document identifier
CEI-ES-033
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
1.1
Published
17 Aug 2024
Last reviewed
17 Jun 2025
Next review
17 Dec 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.33
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2024 Q3
Review type
Intervention review
Search executed
17 May 2024

§1Abstract

§1.1Review question

What is the evidence for thymic peptides in chronic viral hepatitis, sepsis and non-specific immune support?

§1.2PICO frame

Table 1. The registered PICO frame. Any change made after protocol registration is recorded in the amendment log at §5 and is identified there as post hoc.

ElementAs registered
PopulationAdults with chronic hepatitis B or C, adults with severe sepsis, and healthy adults.
InterventionThymosin alpha-1 or thymalin.
ComparatorPlacebo or standard care.
OutcomesSustained virological response; 28-day all-cause mortality; any immunological or clinical outcome in healthy adults.

§1.3Method in brief

A review of the effects of an intervention on pre-specified outcomes, with a quantitative synthesis where the contributing studies are sufficiently similar. The protocol was registered with the Institute's secretariat before the search was executed. The search was run on 17 May 2024 across 8 sources and is reproduced in full at §2. Screening, extraction and certainty assessment were performed independently by two members of the secretariat with disagreement resolved by a third.

§1.4Conclusion

Low certainty evidence supports a modest effect of thymosin alpha-1 in chronic viral hepatitis in an era of therapy now superseded, and a single-country mortality signal in severe sepsis that has not been replicated internationally. No randomised evidence was identified for non-specific immune support in healthy adults, which is the use under which this compound group is most often supplied. The Institute grades that use very low certainty.

The conclusion rests on 5 contributing studies, listed with their extracted data at §3 and summarised outcome by outcome at §4.

§1.5Limitations

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.