Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · §3

Amylin analogues as monotherapy and in combination — included and excluded studies

The included-studies table with extracted data, the exclusions with reasons, and the risk-of-bias judgements.

Document identifier
CEI-ES-022/3
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
3.2
Published
10 Aug 2026
Last reviewed
10 Aug 2026
Next review
10 Feb 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.22
Certainty
Moderate
Cycle
2026 Q3
Review type
Intervention review
Search executed
10 Jun 2026

§3Included and excluded studies

Every study contributing to this review is listed below with the data extracted from it. The extraction table is published at the level of the individual outcome and study so that the synthesis can be checked without the reader having to retrieve each source.

§3.1Included studies

Table 4. Included studies with the characteristics extracted from each.

StudyDesignRandomisedDurationAnchor outcome as reportedYear
REDEFINE-1CagriSema (cagrilintide with semaglutide)Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled3,41768 weeksMean change −22.7 % versus −2.3 % with placebo2025
REDEFINE-2CagriSema (cagrilintide with semaglutide)Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled1,20668 weeksMean change −15.7 % versus −3.1 % with placebo2025
PETRE-PH1BPetrelintidePhase 1 ascending dose16 weeksWeight reduction of approximately 8.6 % at 16 weeks in a phase 1b setting2024
CAGRI-SEMA-PH2-T2DCagriSema (cagrilintide with semaglutide)Randomised, double-blind, active-controlled9232 weeksWeight change of approximately −15.6 % in the combination arm; the small sample is the reason the Institute treats the phase 2 estimate as hypothesis-generating2023
CAGRI-PH2-DOSEFINDCagrilintideDose-finding70626 weeksDose-dependent change to −10.8 % at 4.5 mg versus −3.0 % with placebo2021
PRAM-OBESITY-PH2PramlintideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled41116 weeksA weight reduction of approximately 3.7 % relative to placebo; development in obesity was not continued as a monotherapy2007
PETRE-PH2-OBESITYPetrelintideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled42 weeksno result held
REDEFINE-4CagriSema (cagrilintide with semaglutide)Randomised, double-blind, active-controlled72 weeksno result held
8 included studies. Each links to its structured abstract, which carries a field-by-field provenance table distinguishing extracted figures from Institute reconstructions.

Contributing participants across studies reporting a randomised total: 5,832. Studies for which the Institute does not hold a randomised total contribute to the qualitative synthesis and not to any pooled figure.

§3.2Excluded at full text, with reasons

Table 5. Reports excluded at full text, by reason. A review that reports an exclusion count without reasons cannot be checked against its own protocol.

Reason for exclusionReports
Not a randomised comparison2
Population outside the review question3
Intervention outside the review question6
Comparator not eligible5
No eligible outcome reported8
Duplicate report of an included study7
Conference abstract without extractable data7
Retracted or subject to an expression of concern9
40 reports excluded at full text in total.

§3.3Risk of bias across included studies

Table 6. Risk-of-bias judgement recorded for each included study on the review's anchor outcome.

StudyRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionPublication bias
REDEFINE-1LowLowSomeLowLow
REDEFINE-2SomeLowLowLowLow
PETRE-PH1BLowLowLowHighLow
CAGRI-SEMA-PH2-T2DLowLowLowHighLow
CAGRI-PH2-DOSEFINDSomeLowLowLowLow
PRAM-OBESITY-PH2LowLowSomeSomeLow
PETRE-PH2-OBESITYSomeLowLowLowSome
REDEFINE-4SomeLowLowSomeLow
Judgements are the Institute's own and are recorded per outcome. A study may carry a different judgement in a different review that assesses a different outcome from it.
Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.