Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §3

Lixisenatide — clinical evidence

Assessed outcomes with certainty ratings, contributing trials and the reasoning for each rating.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-010/3
Series
Compound monograph
Version
3.1
Published
12 Oct 2024
Last reviewed
12 Apr 2025
Next review
12 Apr 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.10
Certainty
Moderate
Cycle
2024 Q4

§3Clinical evidence

Assessed outcomes for LixisenatidePoint estimates with confidence intervals for each contributing study, plotted against the line of no effect.0.00.20.40.60.81.0Standardised direction and relative magnitude of the recorded effectIndicationEffect as recordedCardiovascular1 trial · HighMACE hazard ratio 1.02 — neutralType 2 diabetes3 trials · High−0.7 to −0.9 % HbA1c at 24 weeks with…Obesity1 trial · Moderate−1.8 to −2.7 kg
Moderate or high certaintyLow or very low certainty
Figure 3. Illustrative. Assessed outcomes plotted on a common standardised axis so that direction and relative magnitude can be compared at a glance. The estimates are not on a common natural scale and the intervals are the Institute's standardised representation of the reported precision, not the published confidence intervals. Published intervals appear in the per-indication extracts and in the text below.

§3.1Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk reduction

Anchor outcome. Three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke).

Effect as recorded. MACE hazard ratio 1.02 — neutral; HR 1.02 (95 % CI 0.89 to 1.17).[1,2]

Certainty. High certainty A clearly neutral event-driven result in a post-acute-coronary-syndrome population. The Institute cites ELIXA whenever the assertion of a class-wide cardiovascular benefit is made.

Contributing trials. ELIXA. Full structured abstracts are published for each.

Full evidence extract for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk reduction · Indication assessment

§3.2Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Anchor outcome. Change in HbA1c (%, mmol/mol).

Effect as recorded. −0.7 to −0.9 % HbA1c at 24 weeks with pronounced postprandial glucose reduction; GetGoal-M difference versus placebo −0.5 % (95 % CI −0.7 to −0.4).[2,3]

Certainty. High certainty Smaller HbA1c effect than the long-acting agents, with a distinctly different postprandial profile.

Contributing trials. GETGOAL-M · GETGOAL-L · GETGOAL-DUO-1. Full structured abstracts are published for each.

Full evidence extract for type 2 diabetes mellitus · Indication assessment

§3.3Obesity and overweight in adults

Anchor outcome. Percentage change in body weight from baseline.

Effect as recorded. −1.8 to −2.7 kg; modest.[3,4]

Certainty. Moderate certainty No obesity programme.

Contributing trials. GETGOAL-M. Full structured abstracts are published for each.

Full evidence extract for obesity and overweight in adults · Indication assessment

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R, Dickstein K, Gerstein HC, Køber LV, Lawson FC, Ping L, Wei X, Lewis EF, Maggioni AP, McMurray JJV, Probstfield JL, Riddle MC, Solomon SD, Tardif JC. Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2015;373(23):2247–2257. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1509225 · PMID 26630143
  2. Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metabolism 2018;27(4):740–756. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001 · PMID 29617641
  3. Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J, Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes — state-of-the-art. Molecular Metabolism 2021;46:101102. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101102 · PMID 33068776
  4. D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2014;101:2–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012 · PMID 25044089

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.