Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · evidence extract

Lixisenatide in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk reduction — evidence extract

The Institute's graded assessment of Lixisenatide for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk reduction, with the contributing trials and the domain-by-domain certainty reasoning.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-010/EV-CVD
Series
Evidence extract
Version
3.1
Published
12 Oct 2024
Last reviewed
12 Apr 2025
Next review
12 Apr 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.10
Certainty
High
Cycle
2024 Q4

§1Evidence extract: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk reduction

§1.1Question and anchor outcome

Population
Established atherosclerotic disease of the coronary, cerebral or peripheral arterial beds, or a risk profile sufficient for enrolment in a cardiovascular outcome trial.
Intervention
Lixisenatide, subcutaneous once daily before the first meal of the day
Comparator
As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
Anchor outcome
Three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke)

Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Cardiovascular death; All-cause death; Hospitalisation for heart failure.

§1.2Contributing trials

Table 1. Trials contributing to the assessment of Lixisenatide in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk reduction.

TrialPhaseDesignRandomisedDurationYear
ELIXA3Event-driven cardiovascular outcome trial6,068Median 25 months2015

§1.3Certainty assessment

Certainty assessment by domainDowngrading decision recorded for each certainty domain.Certainty domainNo concernSeriousVery seriousEffect on ratingRisk of biasno downgradeInconsistencyno downgradeIndirectnessno downgradeImprecisionno downgradePublication biasno downgradeTotal downgrading: 0 levelsHigh certainty
Figure 2. Domain-by-domain certainty assessment for Lixisenatide in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk reduction. The starting rating for a body of randomised evidence is high; each serious concern reduces it by one level and each very serious concern by two.

Table 2. Reasoning recorded against each certainty domain.

DomainRatingReasoning
Risk of biasNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
InconsistencyNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
IndirectnessNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
ImprecisionNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
Publication biasNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
Overall rating: High certainty. The Institute is confident that the true effect lies close to the estimate. Further research is very unlikely to change confidence in the estimate.

§1.4What this extract does not establish

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R, Dickstein K, Gerstein HC, Køber LV, Lawson FC, Ping L, Wei X, Lewis EF, Maggioni AP, McMurray JJV, Probstfield JL, Riddle MC, Solomon SD, Tardif JC. Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2015;373(23):2247–2257. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1509225 · PMID 26630143
  2. Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metabolism 2018;27(4):740–756. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001 · PMID 29617641
  3. Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J, Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes — state-of-the-art. Molecular Metabolism 2021;46:101102. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101102 · PMID 33068776

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.