Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §3

Danuglipron — clinical evidence

Assessed outcomes with certainty ratings, contributing trials and the reasoning for each rating.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-012/3
Series
Compound monograph
Version
4.3
Published
20 May 2025
Last reviewed
20 Jul 2026
Next review
20 Jul 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.12
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2025 Q2

§3Clinical evidence

Assessed outcomes for DanuglipronPoint estimates with confidence intervals for each contributing study, plotted against the line of no effect.0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2Standardised direction and relative magnitude of the recorded effectIndicationEffect as recordedType 2 diabetes1 trial · Moderate−1.16 % HbA1c at 16 weeks with 120 mg…Obesity1 trial · Low−8.0 to −13.0 % body weight at 32 weeks…
Moderate or high certaintyLow or very low certainty
Figure 3. Illustrative. Assessed outcomes plotted on a common standardised axis so that direction and relative magnitude can be compared at a glance. The estimates are not on a common natural scale and the intervals are the Institute's standardised representation of the reported precision, not the published confidence intervals. Published intervals appear in the per-indication extracts and in the text below.

§3.1Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Anchor outcome. Change in HbA1c (%, mmol/mol).

Effect as recorded. −1.16 % HbA1c at 16 weeks with 120 mg twice daily versus placebo; estimated difference −1.16 % (95 % CI −1.55 to −0.77).[1,2]

Certainty. Moderate certainty Phase 2b; efficacy was established but did not exceed the injectable class.

Contributing trials. DANU-PH2B-T2D. Full structured abstracts are published for each.

Full evidence extract for type 2 diabetes mellitus · Indication assessment

§3.2Obesity and overweight in adults

Anchor outcome. Percentage change in body weight from baseline.

Effect as recorded. −8.0 to −13.0 % body weight at 32 weeks across doses, with discontinuation rates above 50 % in some arms; wide; high attrition compromises the estimate.[2,3]

Certainty. Low certainty Downgraded two levels: attrition above 50 % in the higher-dose arms makes the treatment-policy estimate unreliable.

Contributing trials. DANU-PH2B-OBESITY. Full structured abstracts are published for each.

Full evidence extract for obesity and overweight in adults · Indication assessment

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Saxena AR, Frias JP, Brown LS, Gorman DN, Vasas S, Tsamandouras N, Birnbaum MJ. Efficacy and safety of oral small molecule glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist danuglipron for glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open 2023;6(5):e2314493. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14493 · PMID 37237090
  2. Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metabolism 2018;27(4):740–756. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001 · PMID 29617641
  3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH M7(R2) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2023;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.