Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · evidence extract

Danuglipron in type 2 diabetes mellitus — evidence extract

The Institute's graded assessment of Danuglipron for type 2 diabetes mellitus, with the contributing trials and the domain-by-domain certainty reasoning.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-012/EV-T2DM
Series
Evidence extract
Version
4.3
Published
20 May 2025
Last reviewed
20 Jul 2026
Next review
20 Jul 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.12
Certainty
Moderate
Cycle
2025 Q2

§1Evidence extract: Type 2 diabetes mellitus

§1.1Question and anchor outcome

Population
A disorder of glucose regulation characterised by insulin resistance with relative insulin deficiency, diagnosed by glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose or oral glucose tolerance criteria.
Intervention
Danuglipron, oral, twice daily in the phase 2b programme
Comparator
As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
Anchor outcome
Change in HbA1c (%, mmol/mol)

Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Proportion achieving HbA1c <7.0 % and ≤6.5 %; Change in fasting serum glucose; Change in body weight; Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia.

§1.2Contributing trials

Table 1. Trials contributing to the assessment of Danuglipron in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

TrialPhaseDesignRandomisedDurationYear
DANU-PH2B-T2D2bRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled41116 weeks2023

§1.3Certainty assessment

Certainty assessment by domainDowngrading decision recorded for each certainty domain.Certainty domainNo concernSeriousVery seriousEffect on ratingRisk of biasdowngrade one levelInconsistencyno downgradeIndirectnessno downgradeImprecisionno downgradePublication biasno downgradeTotal downgrading: 1 levelModerate certainty
Figure 2. Domain-by-domain certainty assessment for Danuglipron in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The starting rating for a body of randomised evidence is high; each serious concern reduces it by one level and each very serious concern by two.

Table 2. Reasoning recorded against each certainty domain.

DomainRatingReasoning
Risk of biasSeriousContributing trials are sponsor-conducted and one is open-label.
InconsistencyNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
IndirectnessNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
ImprecisionNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
Publication biasNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
Overall rating: Moderate certainty. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Further research is likely to have an important impact on confidence in the estimate.

§1.4What this extract does not establish

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Saxena AR, Frias JP, Brown LS, Gorman DN, Vasas S, Tsamandouras N, Birnbaum MJ. Efficacy and safety of oral small molecule glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist danuglipron for glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open 2023;6(5):e2314493. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14493 · PMID 37237090
  2. Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metabolism 2018;27(4):740–756. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001 · PMID 29617641
  3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH M7(R2) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2023;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.