Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions accepted — page 24

The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.

Submissions

735 documents · page 24 of 25

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-RUSSIAN-REGI/012Draft synthesis: Nationally registered neuropeptides and the…Dr Melisande Kirkpatrick-OlaAbsence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence
DRAFT-RUSSIAN-REGI/014Draft synthesis: Nationally registered neuropeptides and the…Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-IlungaRegistered trials that never reported are not counted anywhere in the review
DRAFT-RUSSIAN-REGI/015Draft synthesis: Nationally registered neuropeptides and the…Thaddeus Isaksen-BalogunThe timepoint at which each outcome was extracted was chosen after the data were seen
DRAFT-SPONSOR-COND/002Draft synthesis: The consequences of a wholly sponsor-generated…Anselm MountstephenThe search strategy as published cannot be re-run
DRAFT-SPONSOR-COND/005Draft synthesis: The consequences of a wholly sponsor-generated…Dr Vittoria QuintanilhaRegistered trials that never reported are not counted anywhere in the review
DRAFT-SPONSOR-COND/006Draft synthesis: The consequences of a wholly sponsor-generated…Dr Oisín RautavaaraOverlapping primary studies across included reviews are counted more than once
DRAFT-SPONSOR-COND/009Draft synthesis: The consequences of a wholly sponsor-generated…Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-IlungaRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-SURROGATE-OU/004Draft synthesis: Percentage weight change as a surrogate outcomeDr Constança Glendinning-UcheThe same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-SURROGATE-OU/005Draft synthesis: Percentage weight change as a surrogate outcomeDr Oisín RautavaaraOverlapping primary studies across included reviews are counted more than once
DRAFT-SURROGATE-OU/007Draft synthesis: Percentage weight change as a surrogate outcomeDr Lorcan Zaleski-MbekiEfficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not
DRAFT-SURROGATE-OU/008Draft synthesis: Percentage weight change as a surrogate outcomeDr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunIntention-to-treat and efficacy-estimand results are combined without distinction
DRAFT-SURROGATE-OU/009Draft synthesis: Percentage weight change as a surrogate outcomeDr Leonhard QuennevilleDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-AMYLIN-ANALO/001Draft synthesis: Amylin analogues as monotherapy and in combinationDr Theodora IngelbrechtDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-AMYLIN-ANALO/002Draft synthesis: Amylin analogues as monotherapy and in combinationDr Melisande Thorsby-NakamuraAnalytical surveys are treated as evidence about suppliers when they establish only what was in a…
DRAFT-AMYLIN-ANALO/004Draft synthesis: Amylin analogues as monotherapy and in combinationDr Evander Ashworth-DanquahAn indirect comparison is presented without an assessment of transitivity
DRAFT-AMYLIN-ANALO/009Draft synthesis: Amylin analogues as monotherapy and in combinationQuentin Whitmarsh-ObiThe review does not say when it will be updated or what would trigger an update
DRAFT-DISCONTINUED/001Draft synthesis: Discontinued development programmes as evidenceDr Delphine TrelawneyDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-DISCONTINUED/002Draft synthesis: Discontinued development programmes as evidenceDr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunA funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it
DRAFT-DISCONTINUED/003Draft synthesis: Discontinued development programmes as evidenceDr Leonhard QuennevilleThe comparator was given at a dose below the one in general use
DRAFT-RECONSTITUTI/001Draft synthesis: Reconstitution practice and delivered doseDr Odalys Thorsby-NakamuraThe sampling frame of each contributing survey is not reported
DRAFT-RECONSTITUTI/002Draft synthesis: Reconstitution practice and delivered doseDr Anselm Thorsby-NakamuraResults obtained by different methods are pooled without recording the method
DRAFT-RECONSTITUTI/003Draft synthesis: Reconstitution practice and delivered doseDr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-PANCREATITIS/001Draft synthesis: Acute pancreatitis with incretin-based therapiesDr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunA single-trial result is presented in the visual form of a pooled estimate
DRAFT-PANCREATITIS/003Draft synthesis: Acute pancreatitis with incretin-based therapiesDr Zdenka Nyquist-ObioraDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-PANCREATITIS/006Draft synthesis: Acute pancreatitis with incretin-based therapiesDr Ivo QuintanilhaResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled
DRAFT-PANCREATITIS/010Draft synthesis: Acute pancreatitis with incretin-based therapiesDr Yaa KettlewellThe timepoint at which each outcome was extracted was chosen after the data were seen
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-IN/001Draft synthesis: Bacterial endotoxin in research-supply peptide…Dr Adaeze Underhill-OkaforThe sampling frame of each contributing survey is not reported
DRAFT-PRIMARY-VS-S/001Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular benefit in primary compared with…Dr Oisín RautavaaraA single-trial result is presented in the visual form of a pooled estimate
DRAFT-PRIMARY-VS-S/002Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular benefit in primary compared with…Dr Jerome PetrossianAn indirect comparison is presented without an assessment of transitivity
DRAFT-PRIMARY-VS-S/005Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular benefit in primary compared with…Dr Melisande Kirkpatrick-OlaResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled

page 24 of 25

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.