Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · Intervention review

Exenatide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: effect on the anchor outcome

In the population defined for type 2 diabetes mellitus, what is the effect of Exenatide compared with the comparator used in its contributing trials on the anchor outcome for this indication?

Document identifier
CEI-ES-042
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
3.0
Published
28 Jul 2026
Last reviewed
28 Jul 2026
Next review
28 Jan 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.42
Certainty
High
Cycle
2026 Q3
Review type
Intervention review
Search executed
19 Apr 2026

Templated review frame. This review question was generated by crossing an indication with a compound for which contributing trials exist. Its prose frame is templated and is shared with other questions of the same shape. Its included studies, its summary of findings and its certainty rating are computed from the underlying records and are not templated. The Institute publishes these questions because the alternative is to leave a question the document set can answer unanswered, and it labels them because the alternative is to present a templated frame as an authored one.

§1Abstract

§1.1Review question

In the population defined for type 2 diabetes mellitus, what is the effect of Exenatide compared with the comparator used in its contributing trials on the anchor outcome for this indication?

§1.2PICO frame

Table 1. The registered PICO frame. Any change made after protocol registration is recorded in the amendment log at §5 and is identified there as post hoc.

ElementAs registered
PopulationA disorder of glucose regulation characterised by insulin resistance with relative insulin deficiency, diagnosed by glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose or oral glucose tolerance criteria.
InterventionExenatide administered as subcutaneous twice daily (immediate release) or once weekly (poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microsphere extended release).
ComparatorThe comparator used in each contributing trial, reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types.
OutcomesAnchor outcome for this indication: Change in HbA1c (%, mmol/mol). Additional outcomes: Proportion achieving HbA1c <7.0 % and ≤6.5 %; Change in fasting serum glucose; Change in body weight.

§1.3Method in brief

A review of the effects of an intervention on pre-specified outcomes, with a quantitative synthesis where the contributing studies are sufficiently similar. The protocol was registered with the Institute's secretariat before the search was executed. The search was run on 19 April 2026 across 8 sources and is reproduced in full at §2. Screening, extraction and certainty assessment were performed independently by two members of the secretariat with disagreement resolved by a third.[1,2]

§1.4Conclusion

High certainty evidence from 5 contributing trials bears on the effect of Exenatide on the anchor outcome for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The estimate the Institute carries in the monograph is: −0.8 to −1.9 % HbA1c depending on presentation and background therapy. Long clinical record; the extended-release presentation is superior to the immediate-release one for HbA1c.

The conclusion rests on 5 contributing studies, listed with their extracted data at §3 and summarised outcome by outcome at §4.

§1.5Limitations

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Holman RR, Bethel MA, Mentz RJ, Thompson VP, Lokhnygina Y, Buse JB, Chan JC, Choi J, Gustavson SM, Iqbal N, Maggioni AP, Marso SP, Öhman P, Pagidipati NJ, Poulter N, Ramachandran A, Zinman B, Hernandez AF. Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine 2017;377(13):1228–1239. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1612917 · PMID 28910237
  2. Buse JB, Rosenstock J, Sesti G, Schmidt WE, Montanya E, Brett JH, Zychma M, Blonde L. Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6). The Lancet 2009;374(9683):39–47. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60659-0 · PMID 19515413

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.