Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · evidence extract

LL-37 in immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy — evidence extract

The Institute's graded assessment of LL-37 for immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy, with the contributing trials and the domain-by-domain certainty reasoning.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-042/EV-IMMUNE-SUPPORT
Series
Evidence extract
Version
4.3
Published
27 Jan 2025
Last reviewed
27 Apr 2026
Next review
27 Apr 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.42
Certainty
Very low
Cycle
2025 Q1

§1Evidence extract: Immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy

§1.1Question and anchor outcome

Population
Pharmacological modification of innate or adaptive immune function, assessed by cell counts, functional assays and clinical infection or oncological endpoints.
Intervention
LL-37, topical and intralesional in clinical studies
Comparator
As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
Anchor outcome
CD4 and CD8 counts

Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Response to vaccination; Infection incidence; Tumour response where applicable.

§1.2Contributing trials

No trial has been identified for LL-37 in immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy. The rating below reflects that absence.

§1.3Certainty assessment

Certainty assessment by domainDowngrading decision recorded for each certainty domain.Certainty domainNo concernSeriousVery seriousEffect on ratingRisk of biasno downgradeInconsistencydowngrade one levelIndirectnessno downgradeImprecisiondowngrade one levelPublication biasdowngrade one levelTotal downgrading: 3 levelsVery low certainty
Figure 2. Domain-by-domain certainty assessment for LL-37 in immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy. The starting rating for a body of randomised evidence is high; each serious concern reduces it by one level and each very serious concern by two.

Table 2. Reasoning recorded against each certainty domain.

DomainRatingReasoning
Risk of biasNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
InconsistencySeriousToo few contributing studies to assess consistency formally.
IndirectnessNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
ImprecisionSeriousThe event count falls below the optimal information size.
Publication biasSeriousRegistered trials without posted results were identified for this question.
Overall rating: Very low certainty. The Institute has very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate. In this series a very low rating most often reflects an absence of controlled human evidence rather than conflicting evidence.

§1.4What this extract does not establish

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2014;101:2–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012 · PMID 25044089
  2. Manning MC, Chou DK, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Katayama DS. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update. Pharmaceutical Research 2010;27(4):544–575. doi:10.1007/s11095-009-0045-6 · PMID 20143256
  3. Wang W, Nema S, Teagarden D. Protein aggregation — pathways and influencing factors. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2010;390(2):89–99. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.02.025 · PMID 20188795

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.