Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · evidence extract

Liraglutide in obstructive sleep apnoea with obesity — evidence extract

The Institute's graded assessment of Liraglutide for obstructive sleep apnoea with obesity, with the contributing trials and the domain-by-domain certainty reasoning.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-007/EV-OSA
Series
Evidence extract
Version
3.3
Published
27 Nov 2023
Last reviewed
27 Aug 2024
Next review
27 Aug 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.7
Certainty
Moderate
Cycle
2023 Q4

§1Evidence extract: Obstructive sleep apnoea with obesity

§1.1Question and anchor outcome

Population
Recurrent upper-airway obstruction during sleep producing apnoeas and hypopnoeas, graded by the apnoea–hypopnoea index on polysomnography.
Intervention
Liraglutide, subcutaneous once daily
Comparator
As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
Anchor outcome
Change in apnoea–hypopnoea index (events/hour)

Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Proportion achieving disease remission or mild disease; Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale; Change in systolic blood pressure.

§1.2Contributing trials

Table 1. Trials contributing to the assessment of Liraglutide in obstructive sleep apnoea with obesity.

TrialPhaseDesignRandomisedDurationYear
SCALE-SLEEP-APNOEA3Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled35932 weeks2016

§1.3Certainty assessment

Certainty assessment by domainDowngrading decision recorded for each certainty domain.Certainty domainNo concernSeriousVery seriousEffect on ratingRisk of biasno downgradeInconsistencyno downgradeIndirectnessno downgradeImprecisionno downgradePublication biasdowngrade one levelTotal downgrading: 1 levelModerate certainty
Figure 2. Domain-by-domain certainty assessment for Liraglutide in obstructive sleep apnoea with obesity. The starting rating for a body of randomised evidence is high; each serious concern reduces it by one level and each very serious concern by two.

Table 2. Reasoning recorded against each certainty domain.

DomainRatingReasoning
Risk of biasNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
InconsistencyNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
IndirectnessNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
ImprecisionNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
Publication biasSeriousThe evidence base is small, recent and wholly sponsor-generated.
Overall rating: Moderate certainty. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Further research is likely to have an important impact on confidence in the estimate.

§1.4What this extract does not establish

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, Greenway F, Halpern A, Krempf M, Lau DCW, le Roux CW, Violante Ortiz R, Jensen CB, Wilding JPH. A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. New England Journal of Medicine 2015;373(1):11–22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411892 · PMID 26132939
  2. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JFE, Nauck MA, Nissen SE, Pocock S, Poulter NR, Ravn LS, Steinberg WM, Stockner M, Zinman B, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine 2016;375(4):311–322. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1603827 · PMID 27295427
  3. Buse JB, Rosenstock J, Sesti G, Schmidt WE, Montanya E, Brett JH, Zychma M, Blonde L. Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6). The Lancet 2009;374(9683):39–47. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60659-0 · PMID 19515413

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.