Kisspeptin-10 — clinical evidence
Assessed outcomes with certainty ratings, contributing trials and the reasoning for each rating.
§3Clinical evidence
§3.1Growth hormone deficiency and growth-hormone secretagogue pharmacology
Anchor outcome. Peak stimulated growth hormone.
Effect as recorded. Diagnostic use as a probe of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function; —.[1,2]
Certainty. Moderate certainty The diagnostic application is the best-established use.
Contributing trials. None identified. The rating reflects an absence of controlled evidence rather than conflicting evidence.
Full evidence extract for growth hormone deficiency and growth-hormone secretagogue pharmacology · Indication assessment
§3.2Hypoactive sexual desire and erectile dysfunction
Anchor outcome. Female Sexual Function Index desire domain.
Effect as recorded. Small randomised crossover studies in men with hypoactive sexual desire reported changes in limbic activation on functional imaging and in behavioural measures; very small samples; imaging surrogate endpoints.[2,3]
Certainty. Low certainty Mechanistically interesting, clinically preliminary.
Contributing trials. KISS-PH2-HSDD. Full structured abstracts are published for each.
Full evidence extract for hypoactive sexual desire and erectile dysfunction · Indication assessment
§3.3Polycystic ovary syndrome
Anchor outcome. Change in body weight.
Effect as recorded. Kisspeptin-54 has been used as an oocyte-maturation trigger in assisted reproduction with reported reduction in ovarian hyperstimulation risk compared with human chorionic gonadotropin; small controlled studies; the decapeptide and the 54-residue peptide are not interchangeable.[3,4]
Certainty. Low certainty The assisted-reproduction work used kisspeptin-54, not the decapeptide. The Institute records this distinction because supply-side material routinely conflates them, exactly as it conflates thymosin beta-4 with TB-500.
Contributing trials. KISS-IVF-TRIGGER · KISS-DIAGNOSTIC. Full structured abstracts are published for each.
Full evidence extract for polycystic ovary syndrome · Indication assessment
References cited on this page
References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.
- D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2014;101:2–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012 · PMID 25044089
- Manning MC, Chou DK, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Katayama DS. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update. Pharmaceutical Research 2010;27(4):544–575. doi:10.1007/s11095-009-0045-6 · PMID 20143256
- Clayton AH, Althof SE, Kingsberg S, DeRogatis LR, Kroll R, Goldstein I, Kaminetsky J, Spana C, Lucas J, Jordan R, Portman DJ. Bremelanotide for female sexual dysfunctions in premenopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled dose-finding trial. Women’s Health 2016;12(3):325–337. doi:10.2217/whe-2016-0018 · PMID 27638896
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · PMID 33782057
Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.