Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · §3

Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2 — disposition

The disposition of every submission and the amendments that resulted.

Document identifier
CEI-CP-006/3
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
02 Jul 2025
Last reviewed
02 Jul 2025
Next review
02 Jul 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.6
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2025 Q2
Window
03 May 2025 – 31 May 2025
Status
Closed
Submissions
15

§3Disposition and amendments

§3.1Disposition table

Table 1. Every submission with its disposition. Each row links to the submission in full.

ReferenceRespondentPoint raisedDisposition
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/005Dr Ludmila TollemacheRegistered trials that never reported are absent from the monographAccepted
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/012Dr Frideswide HazelriggWhat happens when the compound is stopped is not addressedAccepted
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/008Dr Liesbeth QuennevilleDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate pageNoted, no amendment
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/011Hortensia HollingworthThe monograph should not describe how the compound is supplied outside a regulated routeNoted, no amendment
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/006Dr Jolyon Grünbaum-SowandeThe document is unreadable without specialist trainingAccepted in part
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/003Dr Jolanta UttridgeDoses are expressed in units that differ between sectionsAccepted
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/004Dr Georgiana MountstephenThe compound is supplied under names the monograph does not listAccepted
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/010Dr Hyacinth Oyelaran-SteenWhere the compound is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, the cardiovascular outcome evidence should…Accepted in part
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/015Dr Zofia PetrossianThe absence of a rare harm in the trial set is presented as reassuranceAccepted
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/009Dr Amara VandergraafThe population to which the headline estimate applies is not stated with the estimateAccepted
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/002Rosalind PetrossianThe analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompaniesAccepted in part
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/001Dr Rukayat Zaleski-MbekiA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced itNoted, no amendment
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/014Dr Thaddeus Isaksen-Balogun industryTwo factual descriptions of the sponsor's programme are inaccurateAccepted
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/007Dr Dmitri NordhagenReferences should carry a persistent identifier for every cited sourceAccepted in part
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/013Dr Melisande Kirkpatrick-OlaThe monograph should state what the compound costsNot accepted
15 submissions in total.

§3.2Summary by disposition

Table 2. Counts by disposition, with the meaning of each.

DispositionCountMeaning
Accepted7The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.
Accepted in part4Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Noted, no amendment3The submission raises a point the Institute accepts but that does not require a change to the draft, most often because the draft already states it elsewhere. The location is given in the response.
Not accepted1The submission is not accepted. The secretariat response gives the reason. A submission that is not accepted remains published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.

§3.3Resulting amendments

  1. Registered trials that never reported are absent from the monograph — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/005. The trial list now includes every registered trial the Institute identified, with its reporting status stated, and the monograph reports the proportion of registered trials for which no result has been posted or published.
  2. What happens when the compound is stopped is not addressed — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/012. Discontinuation trajectory is now an assessed outcome in every monograph where a contributing trial measured it, and a recorded evidence gap in every monograph where none did, so that its absence is visible rather than silent.
  3. The document is unreadable without specialist training — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/006. Every document now opens with a plain-language summary of not more than 150 words, placed above the technical abstract and carrying the same certainty language, so that the two cannot diverge.
  4. Doses are expressed in units that differ between sections — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/003. A single dose unit is now used throughout each monograph, with the source unit retained in parentheses wherever a conversion was applied, and every conversion is stated rather than performed silently.
  5. The compound is supplied under names the monograph does not list — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/004. The synonym list is extended to include every name the Institute can evidence from a document it holds, each recorded with its source. Names asserted without a supporting document are not added, and the distinction is stated at the head of the list.
  6. Where the compound is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, the cardiovascular outcome… — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/010. Cardiovascular outcomes are now an assessed outcome with their own certainty rating in every monograph for which a dedicated cardiovascular outcome trial of that compound has reported, and are recorded as not assessed elsewhere.
  7. The absence of a rare harm in the trial set is presented as reassurance — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/015. Wherever the monograph reports that an event was not observed, it now states the total exposure and the frequency the contributing trials could have detected, so that the absence is read as the limit of the evidence rather than as a finding.
  8. The population to which the headline estimate applies is not stated with the estimate — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/009. Every headline estimate now carries a one-line statement of the population in which it was observed, and the full eligibility criteria are reported in the included-studies table rather than only in the source.
  9. The analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompanies — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/002. The analytical section is reduced to compound-specific content and cross-references the relevant standards for the general procedure, which shortens it substantially without removing what is not available elsewhere.
  10. Two factual descriptions of the sponsor's programme are inaccurate — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/014. The trial status now reads as completed at a pre-specified interim analysis, with the analysis identified, and the dose is stated in the unit used in the approved labelling. The submission is identified as an industry submission on its face in accordance with…
  11. References should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source — arising from DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/007. Every reference without a persistent identifier now carries an explicit statement that the identifier is not held by the Institute, so that its absence is a recorded fact rather than an apparent oversight.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC Standard 2017;3rd edition. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.