Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · §3

Draft monograph: Pramlintide — disposition

The disposition of every submission and the amendments that resulted.

Document identifier
CEI-CP-071/3
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
30 Jun 2026
Last reviewed
30 Jun 2026
Next review
30 Jun 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.71
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2026 Q2
Window
07 May 2026 – 06 Jun 2026
Status
Closed
Submissions
15

§3Disposition and amendments

§3.1Disposition table

Table 1. Every submission with its disposition. Each row links to the submission in full.

ReferenceRespondentPoint raisedDisposition
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/001Dr Lorcan Whitmarsh-ObiThe compound is supplied under names the monograph does not listAccepted
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/008Ms Rhiannon Okoye-VandergraafPoint estimates are given without an intervalAccepted in part
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/011Dr Katarzyna YorkstoneWhat happens when the compound is stopped is not addressedAccepted
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/009Nkechi Larsson-EkwuemeStorage and reconstitution guidance is given without stating what it rests onAccepted in part
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/012Dr Lorcan Zaleski-MbekiThe document set should be published in translationNot accepted
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/003Dr Leonhard QuennevilleThe search date is not on the face of the documentAccepted
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/010Vittoria Quintanilha industryThe monograph should reproduce the approved labelling rather than paraphrase itAccepted in part
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/002Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunAnti-drug antibody data are omittedAccepted in part
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/005Xiomara Fairweather-DuruThe preclinical section is extensive and the clinical section is notAccepted in part
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/004Dr Ilona Mbatha-FredriksenThe document should state what a reader ought to doNot accepted
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/006Dr Stellan Cholmondeley-AdeDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate pageNoted, no amendment
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/014Dr Jacinta Steenkamp-FerreiraThe pharmacokinetic section does not connect half-life to the dosing scheduleAccepted
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/013Dr Mordecai Bellingham-OjoThe population to which the headline estimate applies is not stated with the estimateAccepted
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/007Dr Fenella Steenkamp-FerreiraQuantitative claims are reproduced without the method that produced themAccepted
DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/015Quentin Gwynne-SarpongDoses are expressed in units that differ between sectionsAccepted
15 submissions in total.

§3.2Summary by disposition

Table 2. Counts by disposition, with the meaning of each.

DispositionCountMeaning
Accepted7The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.
Accepted in part5Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Noted, no amendment1The submission raises a point the Institute accepts but that does not require a change to the draft, most often because the draft already states it elsewhere. The location is given in the response.
Not accepted2The submission is not accepted. The secretariat response gives the reason. A submission that is not accepted remains published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.

§3.3Resulting amendments

  1. The compound is supplied under names the monograph does not list — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/001. The synonym list is extended to include every name the Institute can evidence from a document it holds, each recorded with its source. Names asserted without a supporting document are not added, and the distinction is stated at the head of the list.
  2. Point estimates are given without an interval — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/008. Every estimate now carries its interval where the source reported one, and where it did not, the estimate is annotated as reported without an interval rather than left to appear as a precise figure.
  3. What happens when the compound is stopped is not addressed — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/011. Discontinuation trajectory is now an assessed outcome in every monograph where a contributing trial measured it, and a recorded evidence gap in every monograph where none did, so that its absence is visible rather than silent.
  4. Storage and reconstitution guidance is given without stating what it rests on — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/009. In-use periods now appear only where supported by a cited stability determination on a stated presentation, and elsewhere the monograph records that no in-use stability evidence was identified for this presentation.
  5. The search date is not on the face of the document — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/003. The search date is now printed adjacent to every certainty rating and is carried in the document metadata, so that the interval between the search and the reading is visible without reference to the methods section.
  6. The monograph should reproduce the approved labelling rather than paraphrase it — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/010. The approved indication and contraindications are now reproduced verbatim from the named authorisation with its version and date, and the posology section reports the labelled schedule and the schedules studied side by side, with the source of each stated.
  7. Anti-drug antibody data are omitted — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/002. Anti-drug antibody incidence and any reported association with loss of effect are now reported where measured, and recorded as not measured where the contributing trials did not assess them.
  8. The preclinical section is extensive and the clinical section is not — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/005. The preclinical section is reduced in length, placed after the clinical assessment rather than before it, and opens with a standing statement that an effect observed in an animal model is not a clinical outcome and does not support a certainty rating.
  9. The pharmacokinetic section does not connect half-life to the dosing schedule — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/014. The pharmacokinetic section now states approximate time to steady state alongside the half-life and dosing interval, with the assumption of first-order elimination stated, and records where the assumption is not supported for this compound.
  10. The population to which the headline estimate applies is not stated with the estimate — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/013. Every headline estimate now carries a one-line statement of the population in which it was observed, and the full eligibility criteria are reported in the included-studies table rather than only in the source.
  11. Quantitative claims are reproduced without the method that produced them — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/007. Every quantitative claim now carries the determination that produced it at the point of use, and figures obtained by non-comparable methods are no longer presented in the same row or sentence.
  12. Doses are expressed in units that differ between sections — arising from DRAFT-PRAMLINTIDE-/015. A single dose unit is now used throughout each monograph, with the source unit retained in parentheses wherever a conversion was applied, and every conversion is stated rather than performed silently.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC Standard 2017;3rd edition. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.