Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · Compound monograph

Draft monograph: danuglipron

Consultation on the draft monograph for danuglipron, an oral non-peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist whose development programme was discontinued. The draft records the discontinuation and treats the resulting evidence as informative about the…

Document identifier
CEI-CP-031
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
16 Sep 2025
Last reviewed
16 Sep 2025
Next review
16 Sep 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.31
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2025 Q3
Window
14 Jul 2025 – 25 Aug 2025
Status
Closed
Submissions
3

§1Consultation and window

§1.1Window

Opened
14 July 2025
Closed
25 August 2025
Duration
42 days
Status
Closed — the disposition is published
Document under consultation
Monograph: Danuglipron
Submissions received
3

§1.2Consultation questions

The secretariat put the following questions. A submission was not required to address them and several did not; the questions record what the Institute was uncertain about rather than restricting what a respondent could raise.

  1. Is a discontinued programme correctly treated as evidence rather than as an absence of evidence?
  2. Is the reason for discontinuation reported with appropriate attribution, given that it is drawn from sponsor announcements rather than from a trial report?
  3. Does the monograph state clearly enough what remains unreported from the programme?

§1.3How a submission is handled

  • Every submission is signed. The Institute publishes no anonymous submission.
  • Every submission carries a declared interest. A declaration of no interest is itself a declaration and is recorded as one. A declaration is not a disqualification and the Institute has never given a submission less weight on that ground.
  • A submission from an employee of a marketing-authorisation holder is identified as an industry submission on its face, following a unanimous consultation on the conflicts policy.
  • Every submission receives a secretariat response and a disposition. Submissions that are not accepted remain published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.
  • There is no voting, no reputation score, no reply thread and no editing after receipt.

§1.4Outcome

The monograph was amended before ratification. The discontinuation is attributed to the sponsor announcement with its date, the trials that reported and those that did not are listed separately, and the unreported set is recorded as an evidence gap.

The disposition table, listing each submission with its disposition and the resulting amendment, is at §3.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.