Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions accepted — page 3

The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.

Submissions

681 documents · page 3 of 23

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/008Draft citation policyDr Oswin YorkstoneThe position of a contributor who withdraws consent is not stated
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/007Draft citation policyDr Kamila UbertiniWhether external reviewers are paid is not stated
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/005Draft citation policyDr Vasilisa ImmelmannThe policy does not say what happens to a document the Institute is asked to remove
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/002Draft citation policyDr Delphine TrelawneyThe search date is not on the face of the document
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/013Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme recordsDr Melisande Thorsby-NakamuraThe position of a contributor who withdraws consent is not stated
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/009Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme recordsDr Beatrijs HazelriggThe same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/007Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme recordsDr Yolanda Norrington-BhattThe terms on which the documents may be reused are not stated
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/001Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsDr Oisín Marchetti-BasseyA determination does not record the version of the standard it was made under
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/004Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsDr Hyacinth Oyelaran-SteenTerms are used in senses that differ from established pharmacopoeial usage
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/010Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsKolawole Jankowiak-OseiThe scope does not say which materials the standard excludes
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/002Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsDr Rurik Haverkamp-DialloQuantitative claims are reproduced without the method that produced them
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/003Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsDr Amara VandergraafThe limitations section states what the method cannot do but not what a reader will wrongly conclude
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/007Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsDr Rosalind Grünbaum-SowandeThe standard does not say what to do with a result outside the expected range
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/005Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesDr Jacinta Steenkamp-FerreiraThe same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/002Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesYusuf Whitmarsh-ObiA withdrawn document should not simply disappear
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/007Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesDr Lorcan Zaleski-MbekiThe same quantity is presented differently in two series
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/003Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesDr Wolfram Kaltenbach-MensahThe search date is not on the face of the document
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/004Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesQuentin Gwynne-SarpongA printed copy loses the information that makes it checkable
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/012Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Katarzyna Oppenheimer-AdeA single-trial result is presented in the visual form of a pooled estimate
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/013Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Bertrand Steenkamp-FerreiraDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/009Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Kolawole Oppenheimer-AdeRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/015Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Torvald KettlewellThe conclusion is stated more strongly than the certainty rating supports
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/010Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergRegistered trials that never reported are not counted anywhere in the review
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/007Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Georgiana MountstephenResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/003Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Liesbeth QuennevilleThe review does not say when it will be updated or what would trigger an update
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/001Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Zebedee Zaleski-MbekiAnalytical surveys are treated as evidence about suppliers when they establish only what was in a…
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/006Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Ludmila TollemacheAbsence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/005Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Gervase AbergavennyThe search strategy as published cannot be re-run
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/009Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Yolanda Norrington-BhattDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/012Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Ivo QuintanilhaThe search date is not on the face of the document

page 3 of 23

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.