Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions accepted — page 20

The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.

Submissions

681 documents · page 20 of 23

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/011Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Kolawole Jankowiak-OseiThe standard would be applied more consistently with a worked example
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/012Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Dr Ngozi ZetterlundThe standard does not say what to do with a result outside the expected range
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/009Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Dr Wilhelmina WintringhamThe draft prescribes a procedure where it should state performance
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/007Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Ludmila BrackenridgeAbsence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/008Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Dr Fenella LavrentievThe matrix interferes with the determination and no control is required
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/006Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Dr Hamish Nyquist-ObioraRounding conventions are not stated and change the reported result
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/016Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Dr Jolanta UttridgeA determination does not record the version of the standard it was made under
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/015Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Dr Georgiana MountstephenThe search date is not on the face of the document
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/004Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Dr Frideswide NordhagenThe same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-PHOTOSTABILI/004Draft standard CEI-MS-20: Photostability assessment of…Dr Katarzyna YorkstoneA determination does not record the version of the standard it was made under
DRAFT-PHOTOSTABILI/003Draft standard CEI-MS-20: Photostability assessment of…Dr Lorcan Zaleski-MbekiThe scope does not say which materials the standard excludes
DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/004Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared…Ludmila BrackenridgeAbsence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence
DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/003Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared…Dr Fenella LavrentievThe same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/005Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared…Dr Hamish Nyquist-ObioraDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/002Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared…Dr Wilhelmina WintringhamEfficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not
DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/001Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared…Dr Matthias Whitmarsh-ObiThe review does not say when it will be updated or what would trigger an update
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/009Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Georgiana MountstephenThe conclusion is stated more strongly than the certainty rating supports
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/003Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Amara QuaresmaStudies using different outcome definitions are pooled into one estimate
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/008Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Mordecai Bellingham-OjoA single-trial result is presented in the visual form of a pooled estimate
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/001Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Wolfram Kaltenbach-MensahA funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/013Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Henrike JastrzębskaIntention-to-treat and efficacy-estimand results are combined without distinction
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/006Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Katarzyna YorkstoneEfficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/005Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Rurik Underhill-Okafor industryTwo factual descriptions of the sponsor's programme are inaccurate
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/009Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Eamon ImmelmannThe same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/007Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Rurik Haverkamp-DialloThe search strategy as published cannot be re-run
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/001Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Ignatius ErlingssonThe search date is not on the face of the document
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/010Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Liesbeth Zaleski-MbekiRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/011Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Liesbeth Zaleski-MbekiEfficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/011Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Dr Bertrand Steenkamp-FerreiraAnalytical surveys are treated as evidence about suppliers when they establish only what was in a…
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/003Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Yusuf Whitmarsh-Obi industryTwo factual descriptions of the sponsor's programme are inaccurate

page 20 of 23

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.