Consultation record
Submissions accepted — page 20
The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.
Submissions
681 documents · page 20 of 23
Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.
| Reference | Consultation | Respondent | Point raised |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/011 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Kolawole Jankowiak-Osei | The standard would be applied more consistently with a worked example |
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/012 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Dr Ngozi Zetterlund | The standard does not say what to do with a result outside the expected range |
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/009 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Dr Wilhelmina Wintringham | The draft prescribes a procedure where it should state performance |
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/007 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Ludmila Brackenridge | Absence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence |
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/008 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Dr Fenella Lavrentiev | The matrix interferes with the determination and no control is required |
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/006 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Dr Hamish Nyquist-Obiora | Rounding conventions are not stated and change the reported result |
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/016 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Dr Jolanta Uttridge | A determination does not record the version of the standard it was made under |
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/015 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Dr Georgiana Mountstephen | The search date is not on the face of the document |
| DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/004 | Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not… | Dr Frideswide Nordhagen | The same concept is given three different names in one document |
| DRAFT-PHOTOSTABILI/004 | Draft standard CEI-MS-20: Photostability assessment of… | Dr Katarzyna Yorkstone | A determination does not record the version of the standard it was made under |
| DRAFT-PHOTOSTABILI/003 | Draft standard CEI-MS-20: Photostability assessment of… | Dr Lorcan Zaleski-Mbeki | The scope does not say which materials the standard excludes |
| DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/004 | Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared… | Ludmila Brackenridge | Absence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence |
| DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/003 | Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared… | Dr Fenella Lavrentiev | The same concept is given three different names in one document |
| DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/005 | Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared… | Dr Hamish Nyquist-Obiora | Doses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response |
| DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/002 | Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared… | Dr Wilhelmina Wintringham | Efficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not |
| DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/001 | Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared… | Dr Matthias Whitmarsh-Obi | The review does not say when it will be updated or what would trigger an update |
| DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/009 | Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1… | Dr Georgiana Mountstephen | The conclusion is stated more strongly than the certainty rating supports |
| DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/003 | Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1… | Dr Amara Quaresma | Studies using different outcome definitions are pooled into one estimate |
| DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/008 | Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1… | Dr Mordecai Bellingham-Ojo | A single-trial result is presented in the visual form of a pooled estimate |
| DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/001 | Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1… | Dr Wolfram Kaltenbach-Mensah | A funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it |
| DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/013 | Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1… | Dr Henrike Jastrzębska | Intention-to-treat and efficacy-estimand results are combined without distinction |
| DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/006 | Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1… | Dr Katarzyna Yorkstone | Efficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not |
| DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/005 | Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin… | Dr Rurik Underhill-Okafor industry | Two factual descriptions of the sponsor's programme are inaccurate |
| DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/009 | Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin… | Dr Eamon Immelmann | The same concept is given three different names in one document |
| DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/007 | Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin… | Dr Rurik Haverkamp-Diallo | The search strategy as published cannot be re-run |
| DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/001 | Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin… | Ignatius Erlingsson | The search date is not on the face of the document |
| DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/010 | Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin… | Dr Liesbeth Zaleski-Mbeki | Risk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains |
| DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/011 | Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin… | Dr Liesbeth Zaleski-Mbeki | Efficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not |
| DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/011 | Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of… | Dr Bertrand Steenkamp-Ferreira | Analytical surveys are treated as evidence about suppliers when they establish only what was in a… |
| DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/003 | Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of… | Yusuf Whitmarsh-Obi industry | Two factual descriptions of the sponsor's programme are inaccurate |
page 20 of 23